The bar chart below shows the passenger kilometres traveled by different means of transport in the UK in 1990 and 2000.
The bar chart below shows the passenger kilometres traveled by different means of transport in the UK in 1990 and 2000. The given bar chart illustrates the number of kilometres traveled by the British using various modes of transport in the UK from a report between 1990 and 2000.
What stands out from the bar chart is that while passenger kilometres by air, bus, rail, and total witnessed an increase, the opposite trend was observed for those by bicycle and motorbike. Additionally, bus users measured by kilometres were consistently the highest.
Starting at the highest point in 1990, with more than 40 billion kilometres, the number of people travelling by bus ranked first, while those using rail ranked second, slightly lower at exactly 40 billion kilometres in Britain. These two figures for bus and rail then experienced a surge over the next ten years, reaching nearly the same number of approximately 45 billion kilometres. The total number of passenger kilometres travelled by all five modes of transport showed a similar trend, increasing from 100 billion kilometres in 1990 to roughly 115 billion kilometres in 2000.
Finally, all three remaining modes of transport in 1990 were under 10 billion kilometres. Bicycle and motorbike riders experienced a slight decrease to roughly 4 billion kilometres and 6 billion kilometres, respectively, in 2000. In contrast, air travelers, who measured the lowest in 1990, became the most popular among the three mentioned modes by 2000.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-23 | Giang Tran | 78 | view |
| 2024-10-23 | Giang Tran | 67 | view |
| 2024-10-23 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-10-23 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2023-03-24 | hyst12 | 84 | view |
- Some people say that we do not need printed paper newspapers Do you agree or disagree 73
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to Scotland who visited four different attractions in Edinburgh.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where revelant. 56
- The charts show the percentage of people working in different sectors in town A and B in two years 1960 and 2010 56
- The graph below gives information about the percentage of the population in four Asian countries living in cities from 1970 to 2020 with predictions for 2030 and 2040 73
- The pie chart below shows the comparison of different kinds of energy production in France in two years 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, if, second, then, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1254.0 965.302439024 130% => OK
No of words: 240.0 196.424390244 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.225 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93597934253 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82192556402 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 106.607317073 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.529166666667 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 368.1 283.868780488 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.0670611423 43.030603864 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.4 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.2 5.23603664747 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.436701309665 0.215688989381 202% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.216215634864 0.103423049105 209% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.282591603089 0.0843802449381 335% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.304502820003 0.15604864568 195% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.271413369642 0.0819641961636 331% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.2329268293 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 11.4140731707 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.