The claim that animals have “rights” has been the subject of much debate since the 1970s. Are zoos helping or hurting our animals? Should zoos be banned? Do you agree or disagree?
Wildlife protection is a widely discussed topic of modern times. While some people believe that building zoos are a good way to save animals, others maintain that restricting animals in a confined area is detrimental to their well-being. This essay will discuss why a zoo is generally harmful to animals and, therefore, it should be banned.
When an animal is brought to a zoo, it is highly possible that its quality of life is compromised drastically. In most often cases, the wild animal will be locked in a cage or deep trench, which will eventually make the animal sick. Studies show that mortality rates of many animals in zoos and safari parks are very much higher than those living in natural environments like forests. This indicates that zoos are harmful to the life of animals.
Despite the evident hardships of caged animals, some people think that zoos serve the purpose of protecting wildlife species under threat of extinction. But what they don’t understand is that the population of animals in zoos is negligible compared to the wildlife population in natural habitats. Under these circumstances, there is no reason to believe that zoos will protect any animal species from possible extinction. It is clear that zoos do not serve any help in protecting animal rights.
This essay discussed how animals are ill-treated in exhibition parks and caged areas. In my opinion, zoos are not serving any good purpose in protecting wildlife and hence, they should be banned.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, so, therefore, well, while, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 10.5418719212 180% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1251.0 1207.87684729 104% => OK
No of words: 246.0 242.827586207 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08536585366 5.00649968141 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96035189615 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69205456417 2.71678728327 99% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 139.433497537 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548780487805 0.580463131201 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 397.8 379.143842365 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.7263179701 50.4703680194 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.2307692308 104.977214359 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9230769231 20.9669160288 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.38461538462 7.25397266985 60% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.276822174944 0.242375264174 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106594822409 0.0925447433944 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0551272188648 0.071462118173 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171494793242 0.151781067708 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.03471412439 0.0609392437508 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 12.6369458128 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.1260098522 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.9458128079 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 11.5310837438 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.32886699507 101% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 55.0591133005 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 72.2222222222 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 65.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.