Experience is a more effective way to teach, compared to books? Agree or disagree.
In recent years, there has been a colossal upsurge in the trend to see prodigies determining one's capability to learn from the experience rather merely based on the knowledge from the books across the world, be it an affluent or impoverished nation. In this essay, I will elaborate end-less process of the studying from the unique experiences is immensely important in this cut-throat competition.
At the outset, there are myriad of benefits which can be attributed to attain knowledge through experience in the real life. The most conspicuous one is that gaining an academic qualification from the books does not necessarily mean that one will be able to learn naturally from various activities. Not only do students read books just to acquire good marks as well as to get employment opportunities, but they also become crippled, dependent and ineffective without attaining knowledge through experience, past mistakes and self-analysis. Needless to say, all these demerits of books without experience have a far-reaching impact on the learners.
To embark this, another pivotal facet of the argument is that in this globalised era where information about anything is readily available due to the ubiquity of the internet, people can practice numerous skills, enhance their knowledge and broaden their horizons. Besides, with an open mind, people can thrive and excel in their career by learning from the past actions, unlike those who do not consider acquiring knowledge from the experience; for example, according to a research, companies always prefer the employees who keep learning, relearn and unlearn from their own participation. Hence, it hardly needs to mention that learning from the experiences enlights the individuals and keep them in a preponderant position.
To recapitulate from the aforementioned arguments, one can conclude that the upsides of learning with constant improvements from the past experience are indeed too great to ignore.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-30 | jashan randhawa | 80 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | manraj123 | 55 | view |
| 2020-01-28 | manraj123 | 75 | view |
| 2020-01-27 | gobindh Singh | 75 | view |
| 2020-01-25 | gobindh Singh | 77 | view |
- In Academic studies, grouping of students according to their academic abilities is good or not? Discuss and give your opinion. 77
- Discuss both sides of Space travel vs. Current crucial problems faced by humans. 85
- Effective learning requires time, comfort and peace so it is impossible to combine study and employment. Study and employment distract one from another. To what extent do you think the statements are realistic? Support your opinion with examples? 77
- Discuss advantages and disadvantages of the Television and give your opinion 70
- Experience is a more effective way to teach, compared to books? Agree or disagree. 88
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 94, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
... the trend to see prodigies determining ones capability to learn from the experience...
^^^^
Line 7, column 134, Rule ID: PAST_EXPERIENCE_MEMORY[1]
Message: Use simply 'experience'.
Suggestion: experience
...ing with constant improvements from the past experience are indeed too great to ignore.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, hence, if, so, well, as to, for example, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 31.9359605911 166% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 5.75862068966 260% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1663.0 1207.87684729 138% => OK
No of words: 305.0 242.827586207 126% => OK
Chars per words: 5.45245901639 5.00649968141 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01231727437 2.71678728327 111% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 139.433497537 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.619672131148 0.580463131201 107% => OK
syllable_count: 513.0 379.143842365 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.65517241379 219% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 20.5024630542 146% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 67.8206458241 50.4703680194 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 166.3 104.977214359 158% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.5 20.9669160288 145% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.1 7.25397266985 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0819454083541 0.242375264174 34% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0413936451167 0.0925447433944 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0285404939839 0.071462118173 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0555816377069 0.151781067708 37% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0303304418351 0.0609392437508 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.5 12.6369458128 154% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.57 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 10.9458128079 148% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.92 11.5310837438 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.35 8.32886699507 124% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 55.0591133005 183% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.3980295567 135% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.