Government should reduce their investment in arts, music and painting. Agree or disagree
Many people are encouraging the investment on arts, music and painting by the government. I completely disagree that because apart these
the public require more facilities to survive. I shall explain about the necessity of investing a budget in proper way through the
following paragraphs.
Firstly, government should invest funds for mandatory needs for the society. In this modern culture most of the human are not getting
enough time to go walking or doing exercise due their busy schedule. Because, there is no sufficient enough of parks and garden available nearby.
Government should spend more money for park and gardens its very essential for human to keep their health fit. For example the survey which has been conducted a month ago it stated that may people die due to health issues because they were not active in their daily routine so it is pivotal for the government to spend money on these rather than on painting and arts.
Secondly, In rural area people are suffering transportation and scarcity of water still. Getting transportation for school and office is
very difficult for the people. Investing funds to increase more number buses will be beneficial for society. Most people are walking more
than a kilometer to get water for the daily survival. Constructing new water pipelines and water tanks will be good idea to invest for
the government. The WHO (world health organization) recently released the notification that more than 1 million people were die due the scarcity of water since 2009 in India. Therefore, government should take action on it and bring more projects to solve the water problem.
To conclude, Investing transport, park, garden and water tanks.., are more mandatory than arts, painting and music in my perspective.
Investment by the government should be effective and useful to the society.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 35, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hese the public require more facilities to survive. I shall explain about the ne...
^^
Line 2, column 106, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...bout the necessity of investing a budget in proper way through the following par...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...way through the following paragraphs. Firstly, government should invest funds ...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hese rather than on painting and arts. Secondly, In rural area people are suffe...
^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 60, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'number' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: number
...the people. Investing funds to increase more number buses will be beneficial for society. M...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e projects to solve the water problem. To conclude, Investing transport, park, ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 71, Rule ID: DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION
Message: Two consecutive dots
Suggestion: .
... transport, park, garden and water tanks.., are more mandatory than arts, painting...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.5418719212 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 8.36945812808 143% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.75862068966 226% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1552.0 1207.87684729 128% => OK
No of words: 300.0 242.827586207 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17333333333 5.00649968141 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6776855678 2.71678728327 99% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 139.433497537 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.54 0.580463131201 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 476.1 379.143842365 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 12.6551724138 134% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.5024630542 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.2936381048 50.4703680194 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.2941176471 104.977214359 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6470588235 20.9669160288 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.47058823529 7.25397266985 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 12.0 4.12807881773 291% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 7.0 5.33497536946 131% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 2.75862068966 254% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208290392825 0.242375264174 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.075730683524 0.0925447433944 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0708475941028 0.071462118173 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.086954338508 0.151781067708 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0748203110347 0.0609392437508 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 12.6369458128 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 53.1260098522 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.9458128079 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.41 11.5310837438 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.32886699507 97% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 55.0591133005 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.94827586207 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.3980295567 85% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 72.2222222222 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 65.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.