Journalist is one of the most difficult jobs in the world. What do you think?
Recently, the phenomenon of "journalist is one of the most difficult jobs in the world" and its corresponding impact has sparked a long-running dispute. Whereas many people are debating the proposition that being a journalist might be remarkably fruitful, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a remarkable number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that journalism as one of the most difficult jobs can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From the society standpoint, being one of the most difficult jobs in the world as a journalist can provide the society with profound effects, which might stem from the fact that increasing awareness of people and producing reports are inextricably bound up. Regarding my personal experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment that discovered the difficulties of some jobs. Thus, invaluable ramifications of both preparing news and the reliability of news distinctly can be observed.
Within the realm of science, without the slightest doubt, the absence of journalism might exacerbate the already catastrophic consequences of the publicity of information. Moreover, fundamental aspects of being a reporter can relate to the reality that the demerits of dangers of news preparation can pertain to the nature of difficult jobs. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that if the downsides of being a journalist were correlated positively with motivation, the local authorities would ultimately address journalism's problems. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the preconceived notion of the value of journalists.
To conclude, despite several compelling arguments on both sides, I opt to vigorously support the idea that the merits of being a journalist as one of the most difficult jobs in the world far outweigh its downsides.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-08-30 | sattar_iust | 85 | view |
| 2020-07-26 | sattar_iust | 88 | view |
| 2020-02-28 | manraj123 | 69 | view |
| 2020-01-24 | manraj123 | 85 | view |
| 2019-11-28 | Arshdeepbatth | 55 | view |
- The first chart bellow shows how energy is used in an average Australian household The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compar 67
- In social situations some people believe that it is better to be a good listener than a good talker Do you agree or disagree 85
- Government should allocate resources prior to the technology research do you agree or disagree Give your own experience and examples 88
- The advanced medical technology will expand human s life Do you think it is a blessing or a curse 89
- The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 140, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...nd its corresponding impact has sparked a long-running dispute. Whereas many people are debati...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, moreover, regarding, so, thus, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.5418719212 142% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 31.9359605911 138% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1638.0 1207.87684729 136% => OK
No of words: 298.0 242.827586207 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.4966442953 5.00649968141 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.32063554497 2.71678728327 122% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 139.433497537 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563758389262 0.580463131201 97% => OK
syllable_count: 514.8 379.143842365 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.5024630542 132% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 52.8126268398 50.4703680194 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.909090909 104.977214359 142% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0909090909 20.9669160288 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.45454545455 7.25397266985 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 2.75862068966 217% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.253505310021 0.242375264174 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0951540156948 0.0925447433944 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109278645924 0.071462118173 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175730070686 0.151781067708 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0912395464451 0.0609392437508 150% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.0 12.6369458128 142% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 53.1260098522 67% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.92 11.5310837438 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.43 8.32886699507 125% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 55.0591133005 187% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.3980295567 123% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.