Many people think that regions affect the successful person. What is your opinion about the native region and accomplished person’s influence on the region he belongs to?
Recently, the phenomenon of the native region and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of accomplished person is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by many substantial individuals. I am inclined to believe that study of both successful person and native quarter can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, the urban region can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that merits of acceptable social structure, as well as cultural growth, are inextricably bound up. According to my experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the influence of influential figures and native region on the personal prosperity. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both remarkable achievements and high level of the living standard can be seen.
Within the realm of science, peer pressure might increase the consequences of committing the crime. Moreover, fundamental aspects of social relationship would relate to this reality that the demerits of violent acts pertain to insecure quarter. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of unsuccessful person is correlated negatively with the remote places. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of sound education and life satisfaction.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of the native region, as well as accomplished peer, outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of friendly neighborhood prove the significance of remarkable prosperity, but also pinpoint practical implications.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 135, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
...that the benefits of the native region, as well as accomplished peer, outweigh its drawbac...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 332, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t also pinpoint practical implications.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1569.0 1207.87684729 130% => OK
No of words: 276.0 242.827586207 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.6847826087 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23255622762 2.71678728327 119% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 139.433497537 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.641304347826 0.580463131201 110% => OK
syllable_count: 497.7 379.143842365 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 1.71428571429 350% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.423540677 50.4703680194 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.75 104.977214359 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.9669160288 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.41666666667 7.25397266985 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.220435175 0.242375264174 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.065866554444 0.0925447433944 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0647673412295 0.071462118173 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121792949478 0.151781067708 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0696646280212 0.0609392437508 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 12.6369458128 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 53.1260098522 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.96 11.5310837438 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.78 8.32886699507 129% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 55.0591133005 191% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.