Mass media, including TV, radio and newspapers, plays a pivotal role in shaping our opinions and characters. What is your opinion?
Recently, the phenomenon of "mass media, including TV, radio, and newspapers, plays a pivotal role in shaping our opinions and characters" and its corresponding impact has sparked a long-running dispute. Whereas many people are debating the proposition that radio and newspapers might be remarkably fruitful, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a remarkable number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that mass media can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From the society standpoint, mass media, including radio and newspapers can provide the society with profound effects, which might stem from the fact that broadcasting information and pivotal roles of TV channels are inextricably bound up. Regarding my personal experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment that discovered the effects of radio on the society's awareness. Thus, invaluable ramifications of both increasing people's knowledge and shaping teenagers' characters distinctly can be observed.
Within the realm of psychology, without the slightest doubt, the effects of mass media on our opinions and characters might exacerbate the already catastrophic consequences of attempting to be a famous person. Moreover, fundamental aspects of mass media can relate to the reality that the demerits of dictating opinions to individuals can pertain to biased media. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that if the downsides of decreasing the self-esteem of youths were correlated positively with positive roles of social media, the local authorities would ultimately address issues of mass media. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the preconceived notion of mimicking celebrities' characters.
To conclude, despite several compelling arguments on both sides, I opt to support the idea that the merits of shaping our opinions and characters by mass media far outweigh its downsides.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-05-04 | vahidmetall | 80 | view |
| 2020-07-18 | Gohar Khan | 75 | view |
| 2020-07-09 | sattar_iust | 88 | view |
- Which areas of concern should governments allocate funds to Climate change education or public health Explain your idea with examples 85
- There are many different types of music in the world today Why do we need music Is the traditional music of a country more important than the international music that is heard everywhere nowadays 84
- The table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia in 1999 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- Many museums charge for admission while others are free Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages 89
- The lazy journalism has become commonplace in today s digitalized world Explain what is it and the cause of it How do you define lazy journalism and what is the cause 88
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 191, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...nd its corresponding impact has sparked a long-running dispute. Whereas many people are debati...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, moreover, regarding, so, thus, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 8.36945812808 131% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 31.9359605911 128% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1714.0 1207.87684729 142% => OK
No of words: 300.0 242.827586207 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.71333333333 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23521594677 2.71678728327 119% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 139.433497537 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603333333333 0.580463131201 104% => OK
syllable_count: 534.6 379.143842365 141% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.5024630542 132% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 57.6352165071 50.4703680194 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 155.818181818 104.977214359 148% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.2727272727 20.9669160288 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.45454545455 7.25397266985 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 6.9802955665 43% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.421310603106 0.242375264174 174% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.139882530529 0.0925447433944 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.12177163316 0.071462118173 170% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.247980364578 0.151781067708 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0615941101535 0.0609392437508 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.1 12.6369458128 151% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 27.15 53.1260098522 51% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 10.9458128079 148% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.13 11.5310837438 140% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.19 8.32886699507 134% => OK
difficult_words: 118.0 55.0591133005 214% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.3980295567 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.