Medical technology is responsible for the human’s life expectancy. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Medical science has made a notable progress in every field. Some people argue that it is insignificant to talk about while some deliberated that it the greatest achievement of the society. However, I firmly believe that there is a momentous increase in the human life expectancy because of rapid growth in the medical science. This essay will further deliver you necessary findings before jumping to the conclusion.
To begin with the positive side, there are the myriad benefits of the medical science but the most eye-catching is, nowadays there is early detection of life-threatening diseases like Cancer, Aids which were not possible earlier. Moreover, now nearly all the hospitals are equipped with the forefront technology so people not have to move from one city to other for the treatment. For instance, earlier MRI scanners were available at the only private hospitals, however, now it is also available at the government hospitals so one can take benefit of it.
Moving ahead, the regular health checkups and constant observation of the health are usually expensive which can burn a hole in the patient’s family. It’s good that one can stay for long years with his or her family and enjoy happy moments but financial burden is a scorching issue.
From the aforementioned points, one can reach to the conclusion that, advancement in the medical technology has proven the boon for the human’s life expectancy but the financial burden is also a sweltering question
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 26, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'notable progress'.
Suggestion: notable progress
Medical science has made a notable progress in every field. Some people argue that ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, so, while, for instance, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 20.9802955665 67% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 31.9359605911 85% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.75862068966 191% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1257.0 1207.87684729 104% => OK
No of words: 241.0 242.827586207 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21576763485 5.00649968141 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94007293032 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87355108628 2.71678728327 106% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 139.433497537 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.618257261411 0.580463131201 107% => OK
syllable_count: 404.1 379.143842365 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.4230715355 50.4703680194 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.7 104.977214359 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1 20.9669160288 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.2 7.25397266985 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18628140645 0.242375264174 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0675053864868 0.0925447433944 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0553247696762 0.071462118173 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115072706541 0.151781067708 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.053913491067 0.0609392437508 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 12.6369458128 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 53.1260098522 73% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 11.5310837438 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.22 8.32886699507 111% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 55.0591133005 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 77.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.