Medical technology is responsible for the human’s life expectancy. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Of late, there has been a colossal upsurge among the prodigies discussing the influence of medical advacement on human life. Some peope think that the advancement in medical technology has no impact on average human life expectancy, while others maintain that development in medicine has greatly influenced and enhanced average human life. This essay will discuss the pros of advancement in medicine followed by its post effects on increase in human life.
At the outset, there are myriad of arguments associated with the enhancement in medical technology. Firstly, the most conspicuous is that the development in medical field has resulted in the cure of many deadly diseases. For instance, diseases like tuberculosis, High fever, Malaria and Cholera which were the deadliest deaseses of their time, can now be easily cured with the advancement in medicine. As a result, it is quite evident that advancement in medical technology has not only proved as cure for various fatal diseases but also resulted in enhancement of human life.
To further underscore, another pivotal facet of this argument that proponents are not cognizant are the pros associated with the advancement in medical arena. Therefore, as an example, horrible and deadly diseases of old times, like black fever responsible for deadth of numerous children can now be easily cured and subsequently save the child from the deadth bed. As a result, the marvels of medical technology to enhance average life expectancy cannot be overruled.
To recapitulate, aforementioned discussion propounds that advancement in medical technology has ensued in cure from deadly diseases and consequently augmented towards enhancement of average human life expectancy.
- The importance of cars and airplanes in modern life. Give examples. 80
- A recent trend in the entertainment world is to adapt classic works of literature for either TV or the movies One argument is that this is to everyone s benefit as it introduces people to works they might otherwise never have experienced while others say 70
- Whether experimental learning can work well in formal education, agree or disagree? 85
- Leaders should let people take part in decision making. Do you agree or disagree 60
- Problem and benefits for high school students studying play and work of theaters written centuries ago. Discuss and use your own examples. 80
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, if, so, therefore, while, for instance, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 20.9802955665 52% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 31.9359605911 128% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 5.75862068966 278% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1463.0 1207.87684729 121% => OK
No of words: 266.0 242.827586207 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.5 5.00649968141 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96835639561 2.71678728327 109% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 139.433497537 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.537593984962 0.580463131201 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 487.8 379.143842365 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.7007654721 50.4703680194 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.0 104.977214359 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1818181818 20.9669160288 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.36363636364 7.25397266985 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.24146813386 0.242375264174 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102569082379 0.0925447433944 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0645237672756 0.071462118173 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162708015267 0.151781067708 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0393341671463 0.0609392437508 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 12.6369458128 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 53.1260098522 57% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.92 11.5310837438 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.4 8.32886699507 113% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 55.0591133005 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.