People emphasizing government to build an advanced transport system rather new road for vehicles that are overcrowding the cities. Do you agree or disagree?
Around the world, people and government are discussing the idea for the transport future in different countries, one could be to build a news road for vehicles that are overcrowding the cities or for creating and advances transport and technology system. Both ideas have followers. However, in this essay, I going to mention my perspective support in my experience as a person to take public transport every single day.
In big cities, public transport has trams, trains subways, buses, taxis and Uber and all these systems work together to maintain the city clear and transport people around the city and suburbs. During the day, there are congestions hours where sometimes this system will be collapse and public transport won't be enough to offer a punctual service for the community. In this case, cities like Melbourne and Sydney in Australia need to have a new transport system to support the new demand.
In the new era, society is asking for transport system more efficient, with new technologies and more comfortable, where people think twice to take their own car. For example, now the world is discussing to build a friendly transport system where respect the ecosystem and the planet.
If the government just discuss the idea to build new roads, the planet will be suffering more pollution and our future maybe won't have more opportunities to create more systems. Actually, the government does not need to create technologies or different transport systems, just with the simple idea to encourage people to use a bicycle will be big progress.
For example, Holanda is one of the first country in the world where more people use the bicycle how a way to go to work, study, shopping...etc.
To conclude is important to keep discussing how to create a new transport system in the world even if we new to build new roads.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | Alireza.r.68 | 85 | view |
| 2019-12-27 | yasamin.gharib62 | 85 | view |
| 2019-07-10 | viviana | 72 | view |
| 2019-06-11 | Nasir-RZN | 88 | view |
| 2019-05-11 | zjaved | 88 | view |
- People emphasizing government to build an advanced transport system rather new road for vehicles that are overcrowding the cities. Do you agree or disagree? 72
- Medical technology is responsible for the human’s life expectancy. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 77
- In developing countries, tourism has disadvantages or advantages? 80
- How mass communication influence our lives especially the children. Discuss advantages and disadvantages. 79
- People emphasizing government to buld an advanced transport system rather new road for vehicles that are overcrowding cities. Do you agree or disgree with this statement? 72
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Around
around the world, people and government are di...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 307, Rule ID: I_AM[1]
Message: Did you mean 'I am'?
Suggestion: I am
...have followers. However, in this essay, I going to mention my perspective support...
^
Line 5, column 106, Rule ID: I_NEW[1]
Message: Did you mean 'knew' (past of "to know")?
Suggestion: knew
...ransport system in the world even if we new to build new roads. people empha...
^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: People
...en if we new to build new roads. people emphasizing government to build an adva...
^^^^^^
Line 11, column 501, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ay to go to work, study, shopping...etc.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, first, however, if, may, so, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 8.36945812808 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 20.9802955665 57% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 31.9359605911 119% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1676.0 1207.87684729 139% => OK
No of words: 327.0 242.827586207 135% => OK
Chars per words: 5.125382263 5.00649968141 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 3.92707691288 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7218843364 2.71678728327 100% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 139.433497537 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.480122324159 0.580463131201 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 496.8 379.143842365 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 4.6157635468 22% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.65517241379 219% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.5024630542 132% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 68.2114767144 50.4703680194 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.666666667 104.977214359 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.25 20.9669160288 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.16666666667 7.25397266985 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.12807881773 121% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.33497536946 94% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.387239358371 0.242375264174 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.145150005736 0.0925447433944 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.115861253641 0.071462118173 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.30235915219 0.151781067708 199% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.214167748069 0.0609392437508 351% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 12.6369458128 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 53.1260098522 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.9458128079 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 11.5310837438 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.32886699507 96% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 55.0591133005 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.94827586207 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.3980295567 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 72.2222222222 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 65.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.