Positive and negative points of the Packaged food

Essay topics:

Positive and negative points of the Packaged food

There is no denying that there is a notable increase in the packaging food. Some people believe it’s good for health while some people believe that it is not good for the health. This essay is going to discuss both the positive and negative factors before reaching the conclusion.

To begin with, there are myriad benefits of it. Due to the attractive packaging life of the food Increases and it remains healthy for a long time. Furthermore, since last many years, producers are making so much attractive that people are dying to buy it regardless quality features. For example, as per the survey by the local news channel, due to change in packing style, the sale of products is reaching to the sky and there has been a significant increase in the sale of products.

On the flip side, due to the change in the packing style by the producers and owners, the cost the food is also increased. In many cases for attracting the consumers, the material is used in the packaging is dangerous to the environment. For instance, in the recent time the use of plastic bags in dramatically increased compared to last year which overall harmful to the environment.

To sum up with this, from the above points of discussion and evidence one should put the limit on the usage of the packaged food and use in a way that will not affect the environment.

Votes
Average: 5.5 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 97, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he attractive packaging life of the food Increases and it remains healthy for a l...
^^
Line 3, column 184, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ime. Furthermore, since last many years, producers are making so much attractive ...
^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...h overall harmful to the environment. To sum up with this, from the above poi...
^^^
Line 8, column 21, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e environment. To sum up with this, from the above points of discussion and ...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, so, while, for example, for instance, in many cases, to begin with, to sum up

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 6.10837438424 33% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 20.9802955665 52% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 31.9359605911 119% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1118.0 1207.87684729 93% => OK
No of words: 238.0 242.827586207 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.6974789916 5.00649968141 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92775363542 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60047037186 2.71678728327 96% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 139.433497537 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.546218487395 0.580463131201 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 352.8 379.143842365 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 4.6157635468 22% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.4402350809 50.4703680194 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.636363636 104.977214359 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6363636364 20.9669160288 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.09090909091 7.25397266985 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.220175536672 0.242375264174 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0796503665219 0.0925447433944 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0835169896254 0.071462118173 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126703333178 0.151781067708 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.05598639402 0.0609392437508 92% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 12.6369458128 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.1260098522 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.9458128079 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.98 11.5310837438 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.32886699507 98% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 55.0591133005 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.94827586207 60% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.