Some people suggest that each family should have one car and not encourage alternative vehicle. give your opinion.
Surely there has been no time in history where the lives of people have changed more dramatically. A quick reflection on a typical day reveals car and alternative vehicle has been one of the prominent topics in contemporary discussions. People have always intrigued to analyze and explain the cars and not encourage alternative vehicles should be compulsory. Regarding this I would say to my viewpoints in upcoming paragraphs.
To begin with, each family should have one car it is good but some people suggest that each family should have one car and not encourage alternative vehicle. Furthermore, in a family more than one car and any other alternative vehicle is a main cause of pollution. Moreover, no much families think about it they do not know the car or any other alternative vehicle are main reason for increasing pollution.
Some people are fond of cars and other alternative vehicle they spend very money for buy vehicles they do not know that the pollution of these vehicles are very dangerous or harmful for humans. Any alternative vehicles pollutant the environment and spread dangerous diseases.
As a case of point, according to my opinion each family should have one car and any other alternative vehicle that type of changes are provide good environment.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 275, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
...is a main cause of pollution. Moreover, no much families think about it they do no...
^^
Line 2, column 278, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
...a main cause of pollution. Moreover, no much families think about it they do not kno...
^^^^
Line 3, column 210, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'vehicles'' or 'vehicle's'?
Suggestion: vehicles'; vehicle's
... or harmful for humans. Any alternative vehicles pollutant the environment and spread da...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 136, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'provided'.
Suggestion: provided
...native vehicle that type of changes are provide good environment.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, moreover, regarding, so, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 8.36945812808 131% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 5.94088669951 67% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 20.9802955665 62% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 31.9359605911 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1068.0 1207.87684729 88% => OK
No of words: 211.0 242.827586207 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06161137441 5.00649968141 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81127787577 3.92707691288 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84586797543 2.71678728327 105% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 139.433497537 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.516587677725 0.580463131201 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 360.0 379.143842365 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 4.6157635468 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.9687706044 50.4703680194 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.8 104.977214359 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1 20.9669160288 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.6 7.25397266985 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 6.9802955665 43% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.44197231286 0.242375264174 182% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.189897969263 0.0925447433944 205% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.195253182372 0.071462118173 273% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.282010578288 0.151781067708 186% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.144147873337 0.0609392437508 237% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 12.6369458128 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 53.1260098522 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.9458128079 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 11.5310837438 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.75 8.32886699507 93% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 55.0591133005 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.