Some people think that schools should select students according to their academic abilities, while others believe that it is better to have students with different abilities studying together. Discuss both views and state your own opinion.
As we are aware of humans being diverse in their abilities, finding academic abilities, which is based on a set of a standard questioner that do not claim to test all the abilities of the children, cannot be the base of the selection in schools. While others might disagree with my above statement but I believe, if the school select students based on their abilities then it might have different abilities student studying together.
Students within a school if selected based on their abilities then it might have a class of student with mixed and diverse ability. This would allow other students with different abilities to interact and understand another student thus the environment of the class would be more interactive than those classes with people having same abilities. Moreover, there will be an opportunity for each student to express their thoughts and ideas thus having different views which would lead to diverse and increase thoughts process among students.
Furthermore, schools are meant to not only educated students but to develop the thoughts process among them. If school starts selecting student based on student's academic profile than the students of those school will only focus on their academic and will not bother with anything else. While student with different ability will allow other student to interact, develop and understand other student because in the practical world they have to deal with diverse people.
To conclude, school selecting student based on their abilities rather than their academic abilities will allow more rich and diverse culture among student that will benefit them in long run of their life.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-27 | yasamin.gharib62 | 77 | view |
| 2019-09-20 | mojtaba1980 | 88 | view |
| 2018-12-03 | Amrit1999 | 65 | view |
| 2018-12-03 | Amrit1999 | 65 | view |
| 2018-09-15 | sunilkms | 85 | view |
- Any recent Invention that you think proved beneficial or detrimental to society 85
- A competitive environment in school and university would bring excellence and need to be encouraged To what extent do you agree or disagree 85
- With technology speeding up, more and more young people begin to use mobile phones and the Internet, but old people have little chance to be exposed to them. What ways could mobile phone and the Internet be useful to old people? How can old people be enco 70
- It is argued that getting married before finishing school or getting a job is not a good choice. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- What is the best invention of last 100 years, the computer, antibiotics, the airplane, and explain why? 65
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 398, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'abilities'' or 'ability's'?
Suggestion: abilities'; ability's
... abilities then it might have different abilities student studying together. Students ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, moreover, then, thus, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.5418719212 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 6.10837438424 213% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 5.94088669951 67% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 31.9359605911 125% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1394.0 1207.87684729 115% => OK
No of words: 266.0 242.827586207 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24060150376 5.00649968141 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45396302653 2.71678728327 90% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 139.433497537 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.484962406015 0.580463131201 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 425.7 379.143842365 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 4.6157635468 22% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.65517241379 27% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 12.6551724138 71% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.5024630542 141% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 38.962786931 50.4703680194 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 154.888888889 104.977214359 148% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.5555555556 20.9669160288 141% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.44444444444 7.25397266985 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.416056154685 0.242375264174 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.216738706212 0.0925447433944 234% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0898900461663 0.071462118173 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.290863928951 0.151781067708 192% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0444802872336 0.0609392437508 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.0 12.6369458128 142% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 53.1260098522 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 11.5310837438 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.32886699507 97% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 55.0591133005 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.3980295567 131% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 69.4444444444 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 62.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.