Tobacco, mainly in the form of cigarettes is one of the most widely used drugs in the world. Over a billion adults legally smoke tobacco every day. The long-term health costs are high- for the smokers themselves, and for the wider community in terms of health care costs and lost productivity.Do Governments have a legitimate role in protecting citizens from the harmful effects of their own decisions to smoke, or are such decisions up to an individual?"
Consuming tobacco in the form of cigarettes by many individual causes many health problems which is hard to be treated in a later stage, it also very difficult to leave drug like tobacco as it influences an individual to not leave such. In my view based on the above stance, I believe, both government and individual should take responsibilities in order to curb the consumption of tobacco from the society. We will discuss the ways in which government and individual could do so.
Firstly, the government has all the eligible power to promote the side effects of having cigarettes, this would cause widespread awareness of having tobacco in form of cigarettes could seriously affect health. Also, Governments should emphasize medical institute to produces drugs such that it would help the tobacco user to quit, as being an addictive drug it is necessary to have anti-addictive drugs that could suppress the addiction of drugs like tobacco. This shows how the government could play a vital role in reducing the consumption of tobacco.
Secondly, form an individual perspective, one might find it difficult, as tobacco being highly addictive drugs. But with the willpower and self-realization of the responsibilities, one could do so. There are proven example around the globe that one could find who have removed themselves from this addictive drugs. Therefore an individual with their willpower could help themselves to not consume drug like tobacco.
To recapitulate, according to the preceding discussion, I am inclined to the opinion that government and each individual can collaboratively help to reduce the consumption of tobacco and also curb the addiction of it thus restricting the consumption of cigarettes as well.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-01 | Rahul Luthra | 77 | view |
| 2019-08-01 | Rahul Luthra | 77 | view |
| 2019-08-01 | Rahul Luthra | 77 | view |
| 2019-07-15 | Sidra018 | 85 | view |
| 2019-07-05 | edsonsimoes | 55 | view |
- The environment we are living in is in danger due to various problems…so who do u think should be responsible for solving it? Is it the governments, organization or each individual? 72
- With technology speeding up, more and more young people begin to use mobile phones and the Internet, but old people have little chance to be exposed to them. What ways could mobile phone and the Internet be useful to old people? How can old people be enco 70
- Does the advent of internet change the role of teacher? To what extent do you agree? 69
- Discuss both sides of Space travel vs Current crucial problems faced by humans 78
- The environment we are living in is in danger due to various problems…so who do u think should be responsible for solving it? Is it the governments, organization or each individual? 65
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 267, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'produce'.
Suggestion: produce
...s should emphasize medical institute to produces drugs such that it would help the tobac...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 317, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...d themselves from this addictive drugs. Therefore an individual with their willpower coul...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, well, as to, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.5418719212 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 6.10837438424 229% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 31.9359605911 132% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.75862068966 208% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1460.0 1207.87684729 121% => OK
No of words: 276.0 242.827586207 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28985507246 5.00649968141 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12496166748 2.71678728327 115% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 139.433497537 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.518115942029 0.580463131201 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 460.8 379.143842365 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.5024630542 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 70.2826642392 50.4703680194 139% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.727272727 104.977214359 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0909090909 20.9669160288 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.45454545455 7.25397266985 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152080519687 0.242375264174 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0656705902424 0.0925447433944 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0408590008017 0.071462118173 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0973959821186 0.151781067708 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0293643215979 0.0609392437508 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 12.6369458128 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 53.1260098522 71% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 11.5310837438 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.32886699507 101% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 55.0591133005 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.3980295567 115% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.