Successful sportsstars and glamorous film stars are a role model for youngsters. Do u support it or not? (Agree/Disagree)
Following successful personalities are very common nowadays. Kids specially in their adolescent ages are attracted towards their glamorous lifestyle. However, it is equally dengerous to follow them blindly just because of their stardome and fame. This essay do not agree to follow the rich and famous movie and sports stars blindly without giving a pensive thoughts.
In the age of information technology, it is very easy to see the lifestyle they live. The lifestyle with full of luxery, money, and fame. Youngsters get intrigued with their flashy lifestyle without knowing the dark aspect of their life. They make them their rolemodel and like to achive same thing as quickly as possible.For instance; Michel Phellep, the famous baseball player found guilty of using performance enhancing drugs. These types of instances also provoke kids to use those insidious drugs.
On the other hand, if we talk about the movie stars. They are also playing a imaginery role in movies which is far from reality. Sometimes they play a role of a true protagonist and sometime they play a role of drug dealer and mifia to earn quick money and enjoy comfortable life. This is not good for young minds because it may instigate them to act like a mafia to earn good money in wrong way.
In conclusion, it is not essential that every successful person is a true hero in their life with good virtues. It is often the case where the dark side of these sports stars and movie stars are hidden from the real world. So it is extremely important to understand that, following them without ruminating properly doesent make any sense, and kids specifically youngstrs must think properly to make sure that they are following the right guy.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-28 | Jasmaansingh1996 | 72 | view |
| 2019-07-28 | dilroop | 55 | view |
| 2019-07-03 | edsonsimoes | 55 | view |
| 2019-06-08 | surinder bakipuria | 55 | view |
| 2019-05-24 | andrefreitas | 72 | view |
- Successful sportsstars and glamorous film stars are a role model for youngsters. Do u support it or not? (Agree/Disagree) 60
- In some countries around the world, voting is compulsory.Do you agree with the notion of compulsory voting?If it is compulsory in a democratic society, what conclusions can we draw about ‘Nature of democracy?’ 55
- Test 11
- It is usually foolish to get married before completing your studies and getting established in a good job? Do you agree or disagree” 55
- Company’s top level authorities should get their Employees in decision-making 72
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 358, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'thought'?
Suggestion: thought
... stars blindly without giving a pensive thoughts. In the age of information technolog...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 323, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: For
...chive same thing as quickly as possible.For instance; Michel Phellep, the famous ba...
^^^
Line 5, column 76, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... the movie stars. They are also playing a imaginery role in movies which is far f...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, may, so, for instance, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 6.10837438424 33% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 20.9802955665 153% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1434.0 1207.87684729 119% => OK
No of words: 290.0 242.827586207 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94482758621 5.00649968141 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53451794486 2.71678728327 93% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 139.433497537 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575862068966 0.580463131201 99% => OK
syllable_count: 449.1 379.143842365 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 4.6157635468 195% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 12.6551724138 126% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.6876282488 50.4703680194 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.625 104.977214359 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.125 20.9669160288 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.625 7.25397266985 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 6.9802955665 158% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.103618725714 0.242375264174 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0318767459915 0.0925447433944 34% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.034544092988 0.071462118173 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0618065601047 0.151781067708 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0322556188612 0.0609392437508 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 12.6369458128 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 53.1260098522 116% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.9458128079 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 11.5310837438 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.85 8.32886699507 94% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 55.0591133005 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.94827586207 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.