technology access to online music

Essay topics:

technology access to online music

The importance of technological access to online music which was always debatable has now become more controversial with many people claiming that it is beneficial while others reject this notion. The substantial influence of this trend has sparked the controversy over the potential impact in recent years. In my opinion, the former proposition appears to be more rational. This essay will further elaborate both positive and negative effects of this trend and thus will lead to be a logical conclusion.

There are myriad of reasons which will further explaining this argument but the most preponderant one stems from the fact that provide help to struggling singers and composes, so that they learn myriad things from now technology. Another pivotal aspect of this argument is that provide individuals can also have access to music and they also provide motivation to the upcoming singers. Needless to say, all these merits stand in a good stead.

However, there are some pitfalls that negate these arguments and which can certainly overwhelm the potential influence of this trend but one of the most alarming one is that it reduces market value and popularity of a singer. Besides, it decreases motivation of singer. Hence, it is apparent why many are against this trend.

According to the arguments aforementioned above, one can reach to a conclusion that the benefits of technological access to online music to made free paid are instrumental indeed. Nevertheless, its potential drawbacks should not be overlooked either.

Votes
Average: 8.5 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-09-29 mohammadsabet 77 view
2022-12-21 Nina Tsarevich 80 view
2022-08-23 NamAchu 78 view
2022-07-15 Nawal Fatima 72 view
2022-07-15 Nawal Fatima 77 view
Essay Categories

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, hence, however, look, nevertheless, so, thus, while, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 20.9802955665 119% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 31.9359605911 94% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1292.0 1207.87684729 107% => OK
No of words: 244.0 242.827586207 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29508196721 5.00649968141 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95227774224 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83367187906 2.71678728327 104% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 139.433497537 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577868852459 0.580463131201 100% => OK
syllable_count: 406.8 379.143842365 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.4166143873 50.4703680194 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.666666667 104.977214359 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3333333333 20.9669160288 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.16666666667 7.25397266985 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193744955762 0.242375264174 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0660899101918 0.0925447433944 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.124651831781 0.071462118173 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130028669476 0.151781067708 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.108560402338 0.0609392437508 178% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 12.6369458128 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 53.1260098522 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 11.5310837438 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.29 8.32886699507 112% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 55.0591133005 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.