Many people think that regions affect the successful person. What is your opinion about the native region and accomplished person’s influence on the region he belongs to?
Recently, the phenomenon of the native region and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of accomplished person is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by many substantial individuals. I am inclined to believe that study of both successful person and native quarter can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, the urban region can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that merits of acceptable social structure, as well as cultural growth, are inextricably bound up. According to my experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the influence of influential figures and native region on the personal prosperity. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both remarkable achievements and high level of the living standard can be seen. be seen.
Within the realm of science, peer pressure might increase the consequences of committing the crime. Moreover, fundamental aspects of social relationship would relate to this reality that the demerits of violent acts pertain to insecure quarter. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of unsuccessful person is correlated negatively with the remote places. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of residential neighborhood.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of the native region, as well as accomplished peer, outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of friendly neighborhood prove the significance of considerable skills, but also pinpoint practical implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-14 | bashirheidari | 88 | view |
| 2020-01-06 | Behnaz fallah | 88 | view |
| 2019-03-26 | cur_zii | 77 | view |
| 2018-08-04 | hchandra | 77 | view |
| 2018-07-17 | Android | 55 | view |
- Government should reduce their investment in arts, music and painting. Agree or disagree? 11
- The space travel is fantastic these days and people are very fascinated towards it but there are many environmental problems in our planet that need to be resolved first. What is your opinion? Should money be spent on space travel or on environmental issu 35
- The environment we live in is in danger. What are the underlying causes? Who is responsible to combat this? 11
- Government should reduce their investment in arts, music and painting. Agree or disagree? 11
- Government should reduce their investment in arts, music and painting. Agree or disagree? 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 535, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Be
...vel of the living standard can be seen. be seen. Within the realm of science, p...
^^
Line 7, column 135, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
...that the benefits of the native region, as well as accomplished peer, outweigh its drawbac...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 330, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t also pinpoint practical implications.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1564.0 1207.87684729 129% => OK
No of words: 275.0 242.827586207 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.68727272727 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24717295988 2.71678728327 120% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 139.433497537 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.64 0.580463131201 110% => OK
syllable_count: 493.2 379.143842365 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 1.71428571429 350% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.092695893 50.4703680194 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.333333333 104.977214359 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9166666667 20.9669160288 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.41666666667 7.25397266985 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.218681222166 0.242375264174 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0607998964098 0.0925447433944 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0646543362614 0.071462118173 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120356630175 0.151781067708 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0690909970331 0.0609392437508 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 12.6369458128 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.02 11.5310837438 139% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.76 8.32886699507 129% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 55.0591133005 191% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.