Technological access to online music and the like should be free or paid. What do you think?
The importance of providing access to online music should be made free or paid was always a debatable topic. Even though, many people claim that online music should be made available free for users. Others reject this notion and argue that anything given free will reduce its value. In my opinion, latter proposition appears to be more rational. The following essay would further elaborate both sides with examples and thus lead to a plausible conclusion.
To begin with, in fast growing world, new inventions and developments of new mobile apps in the mobile app store are available to download. Providing free access to music through these apps or online will help so many struggling singers and composers to learn from the prerecorded songs and music which lead them to settle in these respective fields. Moreover, it will be motivation to the upcoming singers and musicians. For instance, famous singers like SP, Chitra and many prominent singers from India have learnt basics of singing and music from free source app which are prerecorded and kept in online.
On the other hand, many people believe that anything given free reduces its popularity and market value. People take free source as granted and do not show adequate respect to singers and songs recorded by them. It also decreases the motivation of playback composers and they feel that the value of their songs has been decreased due to the advancements in technology such as You Tube, Saavn , My music and many more online apps. For instance, recently in India, a song composed by the great AR Rehman released directly to internet before releasing in movie. This example clearly exemplifies us technological access to music should be paid.
According to the arguments aforementioned, one can reach out to conclusion that anything given for free will loss it's priority, therefore, permissions to access music through online should be made chargeable.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-19 | Shruti gupta radhika | 85 | view |
| 2019-06-27 | harry J | 82 | view |
| 2019-06-27 | Navneet dhillon | 55 | view |
| 2019-06-27 | jashan randhawa | 77 | view |
| 2019-04-24 | zjaved | 80 | view |
- Nowadays, the bickering has common trend amongst youngsters and married people. This has led polygamy and high divorce rates. Justify the response with your positive or negative views. 77
- Whether studying films at school is as important as studying literature? Do you think school should have curriculum asking students to play old drama and work for theater centuries ago? 77
- Workers and nursed should be paid more what is your opinion 62
- children should take larger number of exams or learn more in schools? 55
- Effective learning requires time comfort and peace so it is impossible to combine study and employment Study and employment distract one from another To what extent do you think the statements are realistic Support your opinion with examples 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 392, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ts in technology such as You Tube, Saavn , My music and many more online apps. For...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, for instance, such as, in my opinion, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 8.36945812808 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 31.9359605911 132% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1613.0 1207.87684729 134% => OK
No of words: 314.0 242.827586207 129% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13694267516 5.00649968141 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 3.92707691288 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60900238099 2.71678728327 96% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 139.433497537 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570063694268 0.580463131201 98% => OK
syllable_count: 499.5 379.143842365 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6551724138 119% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.4338409999 50.4703680194 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.533333333 104.977214359 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9333333333 20.9669160288 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.4 7.25397266985 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 6.9802955665 172% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.347566891877 0.242375264174 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116579430755 0.0925447433944 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111832551638 0.071462118173 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.215188386659 0.151781067708 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0565271657808 0.0609392437508 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 12.6369458128 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.1260098522 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.9458128079 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 11.5310837438 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.32886699507 103% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 55.0591133005 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.