The table show the proportions of pupils attending four secondary school types between 2000 and 2009.
The given tabular representation depicts the information about the four different secondary schools attended by learners during the period of 2000 and 2009. Collaboration of data is done in percent.
Overall,it is crystal clear that the attendance of students in all schools had been dropped except community schools where the attendance showed up surged.
To begin with,it can be seen that the specialist schools had been demonstrated mixed attendance throughout the years with slight difference of 1 per centum. Apart from this,community and specialist schools were showed similar percent in the year 2000 which was accounted for 12 percentile.
Moving further,in the year 2000,the attendance of voluntary controlled schools and community schools were highest which claimed to be 24 and 52 percent respectively. After that,the attendance was dropped in the year 2005 and 2009 in both schools. Moreover,more than half of learners attended the community in the year 2009,which was 58 percentile as compared to the other schools in the same year.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-06 | Đa Thiện | 61 | view |
| 2019-10-12 | Lia Bui | 73 | view |
| 2019-08-12 | Jotdeep | 78 | view |
| 2019-07-28 | harshiniharshini | 78 | view |
| 2019-07-05 | anmol khipal | 73 | view |
- The pie chart shows the main reasons why agricultural land become less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during 1990. 78
- Some people believe that movies should be based on social stigmas while others believe it should be based on real life heros. 89
- Percentage of food budget spent on restaurant meals and home cooking in four years and number of meals per year fast food vs sit-down restaurant meals. 84
- The diagram show the stages and equipments used in the process of cement making and how is used to produce the concrete for building purposes. 84
- The table show the proportions of pupils attending four secondary school types between 2000 and 2009. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 8, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , it
...n of data is done in percent. Overall,it is crystal clear that the attendance of...
^^^
Line 5, column 14, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , it
...dance showed up surged. To begin with,it can be seen that the specialist schools...
^^^
Line 5, column 173, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , community
...ference of 1 per centum. Apart from this,community and specialist schools were showed simi...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 279, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'percentile' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'percentiles'.
Suggestion: percentiles
...he year 2000 which was accounted for 12 percentile. Moving further,in the year 2000,the...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 15, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , in
...ted for 12 percentile. Moving further,in the year 2000,the attendance of volunta...
^^^
Line 7, column 177, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , the
... and 52 percent respectively. After that,the attendance was dropped in the year 2005...
^^^^
Line 7, column 256, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , more
... 2005 and 2009 in both schools. Moreover,more than half of learners attended the comm...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 337, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'percentile' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'percentiles'.
Suggestion: percentiles
...community in the year 2009,which was 58 percentile as compared to the other schools in the...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, second, apart from, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 893.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 162.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.51234567901 4.92477711251 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56762134501 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02855007077 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.611111111111 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 250.2 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.8686562359 43.030603864 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.625 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.25 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.875 5.23603664747 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 1.69756097561 471% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.276425973221 0.215688989381 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123437492423 0.103423049105 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0770815086478 0.0843802449381 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179934201152 0.15604864568 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0435156600106 0.0819641961636 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 11.4140731707 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.