Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Children should not have to work or help with household tasks; their only responsibility should be to study.
Sharing household tasks is significant and inseparable in each family. In this regard, whether children should help their parents with housework or concentrate on their study is controversial. However, as far as I concerned, children should take household tasks apart from learning hours due to some reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
To begin with, children can improve their skills by doing household tasks. As a matter of fact, doing household tasks requires hard skills to get the job done in perfectness. The children not only have to be patience but also be assiduous to finish the task. Moreover, children must concentrate on the work and flexible on doing household tasks. Taking me as example, in fact, my parents always share the housework with me. Indeed, I have to wash the dishes after eating dinner and clean the floor on weekend. My friends think that this job is a burden, however, I think that this job is very interesting. I mean, it is the chance for me to improve my characteristic and skills to solve problem that is helpful. Additionally, this job helps me to live more disciplined and cleaned which is essential in my future. In short, doing housework is important for children.
In addition, taking household tasks is a good way for children to be independent. As a matter of fact, children cannot live together with their parents forever. Therefore, taking care of their own life is essential for children’s future. It not only helps them to be decisive but also to be agile. A good example is my brother was sent to study in Japan in 15 years old. Thanks to doing household tasks, he managed to live on his own comfortably. He also succeeded in school jobs, which needs the same independence as doing housework. All in all, taking household tasks has many advantages.
In conclusion, I firmly believe that taking household tasks is important for children after school hours. This is not only because the good skills that children can take on but also the independence that is necessary for children’s future. As a result, parents should let their children do housework at appropriate age.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-29 | hosseindehnamaki | 60 | view |
| 2018-12-14 | bhuvi97 | 70 | view |
| 2018-07-06 | lanxinhh | 60 | view |
| 2018-06-04 | nastaran1992 | 70 | view |
| 2015-06-30 | bigzee | 80 | view |
- It is more important to keep your old friends than to make new friends. 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Children should not have to work or help with household tasks; their only responsibility should be to study. 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement.In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today. 70
- integrated TOEFL writing 3
- Some people prefer to live in small town Others prefer to live in a big city Which place would you prefer to live in Use specific reasons and details to support your answer 35
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, apart from, i mean, i think, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, in short, as a matter of fact, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 43.0788530466 88% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 52.1666666667 90% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1793.0 1977.66487455 91% => OK
No of words: 363.0 407.700716846 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93939393939 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3649236973 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85288011259 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 212.727598566 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.471074380165 0.524837075471 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 535.5 618.680645161 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.408417264 48.9658058833 50% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 74.7083333333 100.406767564 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.125 20.6045352989 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.16666666667 5.45110844103 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 20.0 11.8709677419 168% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.321504585993 0.236089414692 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0987141155461 0.076458572812 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0801497451417 0.0737576698707 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.21385424619 0.150856017488 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0312012389476 0.0645574589148 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 11.7677419355 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 58.1214874552 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.1575268817 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.78 10.9000537634 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.99 8.01818996416 87% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 86.8835125448 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.