Smacking children is the best form of discipline.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Generations ago, corporal punishment was considered an extremely well-respected and popular way of controlling misbehaviour among children. Furthermore, an overwhelming majority of parents still believe that smacking is a superior form of discipline. This essay will argue that smacking children is completely unacceptable and significantly detrimental to them.
Current parenting styles in some families involves bringing up children through the use of fear, which can persuade infants and youngsters to be more obedient. This rough method instills discipline in the child in order to improve their behaviour. However, disciplining through fear can affect the child psychologically in the long term. A paper published by Dr. John Watson, a world-renowned children psychologist, reveals that 27% of young individuals, whose parents raised them with the use of corporal punishment, demonstrated better educational results and statistically are more law abiding in the future. Therefore, it is clearly seen that smacking can be called an effective measure to control some children’s disrespectful and offending behaviour.
Despite the established opinions, the idea that physical force is the principal form of discipline is completely preposterous and incorrect. That is to say, that the adaptation of violence in bringing up children can influence their mental health causing tremendous psychological problems as they mature. In addition, a vast majority of juvenile delinquency has originated due to the vicious physical punishment in their childhood. It can be illustrated by the latest research conducted by Cambridge University, that elucidated the fact, there has been a sharp decline in the number of prosperous young individuals, whose parents employed smacking as a method of discipline. Overall, the idea that corporal punishment is important and essential in raising children is ill-informed and dangerous in itself, potentially leading to far worse outcomes for society as a whole.
Concluding, vicious measures in raising children can be tremendously deleterious in shaping their individuality. As has been shown, the use of force as a method of discipline is entirely inappropriate, needless and has to be avoided.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-30 | Adilrahi | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-30 | Ekjot Singh | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-30 | malveer | 84 | view |
| 2020-01-30 | Harrynguyen1980 | 84 | view |
| 2020-01-30 | Jaydev Patel | 73 | view |
- Sports help to a greater extent to build peace in the world. Do you agree or disagree? Give some examples and include relevant experiences in your response. 78
- Many people believe that road quality safety will be improved when the government will decrease the speed limit, other people believe that there are other ways of improving road safety.Discuss both views and give your opinion. Provide some examples from y 73
- Some people think that the government is responsible for the rise in childhood obesity while others think it is the fault of the parents Discuss both sides and give your opinion 84
- Some people say that in all levels of education, from primary schools to universities, too much time is spent on learning facts and not enough on learning practical skills.Do you agree or disagree? 78
- Fewer and fewer young people are choosing to become teachers. Why do young people not want to be teachers? How this could be changed? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...worse outcomes for society as a whole. Concluding, vicious measures in raising ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, so, still, therefore, well, as to, in addition, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1914.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 329.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.81762917933 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.40605683986 2.80592935109 121% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.568389057751 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 591.3 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.5812196659 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.6 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9333333333 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.86666666667 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.123289658213 0.244688304435 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0431441851777 0.084324248473 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0401254987719 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0809698131267 0.151304729494 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0458671504478 0.056905535591 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.0946893788 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.48 12.4159519038 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.2 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 78.4519038076 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.