Some people believe government should spend money on building train and subway lines to reduce traffic congestion. Others think that building more and wider roads is the better way to reduce traffic congestion.
Discuss both views and give your opinions.
Nowadays, an increase in transportation needs cause a pressure on government to improve and develop the public transportation and its infrastructure. Whether the government ought to use national budget on developing train and subway lines or developing more and wider roads has been a debatable topic. I personally think an investment on train and subway lines is a good solution in long-term to reduce traffic congestion.
On one side of the argument, there are people who believe that government should invest on developing more and wider roads. These people generally state that opening more and make wider roads will solve the traffic congestion of a huge number of automobile. According to these people, public transportation is not convenient for individual needs.
I would be inclined to argue against this as I believe that public transportation is the best solution in long-term. There are many reasons that lead me to believe this. Firstly, train & subway open new and different routes, which are overhead and underground, with fast speed help reduce transportations on ground therefor reduce traffic jams. Secondly, it is also known that developing roads may affect the current active roads and leads to an overloads on them while developing train and subway lines will avoid stopping vehicle on any active roads then cause no inconveniences and affecting on current working routes.
To sum up, there are strong arguments for and against developing more and wider roads. As has been proven above there are certainly pros to develop roads. Nevertheless, I maintain my original opinion that opening new train and subway lines is the best solution in long term to solve traffic congestion.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-24 | Thang Tran | 78 | view |
| 2020-01-11 | happyhappy | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-14 | MOHETH CHOWDARI | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-31 | Lynn2309 | 67 | view |
| 2019-10-03 | Dao Thu Ha | 73 | view |
- IELTES Writing Task 1.1 11
- Not so many people use a bicycle although it has many benefits. Why? How to encourage people to use bicycles as a main transport? 61
- In some cities people are choosing cars instead of bicycles, while in other cities riding bikes are replacing cars. Why is this the case? Which development do you think is better? 56
- Many museums charge for admission while others are free.Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages? 56
- Some people believe government should spend money on building train and subway lines to reduce traffic congestion. Others think that building more and wider roads is the better way to reduce traffic congestion.Discuss both views and give your opinions. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 444, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'an overload' or simply 'overloads'?
Suggestion: an overload; overloads
...t the current active roads and leads to an overloads on them while developing train and subw...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 88, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...gainst developing more and wider roads. As has been proven above there are certain...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, may, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, then, while, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1434.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 272.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27205882353 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9308882382 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 176.041082164 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.536764705882 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 446.4 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.3811880108 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.307692308 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9230769231 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.84615384615 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.269510605614 0.244688304435 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0967032939474 0.084324248473 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0812140627884 0.0667982634062 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172694397355 0.151304729494 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0380798648945 0.056905535591 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 78.4519038076 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.