using modern connect are useful now aday. agree and disagree
In recent years, modern technology influenced the way people connect. Some people say that modern forms of communication such as email or messaging making them take less time their friends. However, I do not agree with this idea because it brings many benefits for social life.
In the past, everyone communicated by letter or by phone that wasted time and money. The person who lived at long distance rarely had chances meet their friends because of busy work. they could not often shared what was happens in life with their friend. so their relationships gradually turned to lose.
these days, you can keep relations far away thanks to the social network such as facebook or Twitter which you don't need to go out of the home. what is more, these services usually free, more convenient and faster. Besides that, you can add friend with other people using social website too, this method to increase your social circle. For example in my case, my best friend is studying abroad in Canada, we have not financial conditions meet together each year, but I still know how she is, what she is doing and what she is thinking by messaging and video calling on facebook. On the other hand, the email incredibly useful for work and life. For instance, in the office, they use email to send documents, contracts, notices to office-workers. Moreover, you can apply for a job to any company despite it situate at other country. it has economized both cost and time than you sent a letter. The email also allows attach emojis, sounds, pictures, files so your feeling will be showing efficiency to the receiver.
All things considered, I believe that generally people use modern communication to keep their relationships now. In my view, I completely trust modern connecting network help me linking with my friends to more and more better.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-05-21 | bassmodulators123 | 84 | view |
| 2024-01-15 | Bigk016 | 61 | view |
| 2023-12-13 | Thuc Linh Dinh | 67 | view |
| 2023-12-08 | MinhGoal1 | 78 | view |
| 2023-11-30 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 89 | view |
- the given graph show the consumption of fast food in the UK ( per week) from 1970 to 1990 56
- The table below show the percentage of female workforce and female managers in five countries 88
- the table shows the monthly expenditures of an average Australian family from 1991 to 2001 56
- People now have the freedom to work and live anywhere in the world due to the development of communication technology and transportation Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 77
- the table shows the monthly expenditures of an average Australian family from 1991 to 2001 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 124, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[10]
Message: The adverb 'rarely' is usually put between 'had' and 'chances'.
Suggestion: had rarely chances
.... The person who lived at long distance rarely had chances meet their friends because of busy work...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 184, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: They
...eet their friends because of busy work. they could not often shared what was happens...
^^^^
Line 3, column 205, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[3]
Message: The verb 'could' requires base form of the verb: 'share'
Suggestion: share
...ause of busy work. they could not often shared what was happens in life with their fri...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 256, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: So
... was happens in life with their friend. so their relationships gradually turned to...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: These
...ationships gradually turned to lose. these days, you can keep relations far away t...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 112, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...k such as facebook or Twitter which you dont need to go out of the home. what is mor...
^^^^
Line 5, column 145, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: What
...ch you dont need to go out of the home. what is more, these services usually free, m...
^^^^
Line 5, column 833, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...ny despite it situate at other country. it has economized both cost and time than ...
^^
Line 5, column 958, Rule ID: YOUR[1]
Message: Did you mean 'you're' or 'you are'?
Suggestion: you're; you are
...tach emojis, sounds, pictures, files so your feeling will be showing efficiency to t...
^^^^
Line 7, column 179, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[9]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to link' or 'link'.
Suggestion: to link; link
...trust modern connecting network help me linking with my friends to more and more better...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 215, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'better' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: better
... me linking with my friends to more and more better.
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, however, if, moreover, so, still, for example, for instance, such as, in my view, what is more, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 24.0651302605 162% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1523.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 312.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88141025641 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51361962372 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.641025641026 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 466.2 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 5.43587174349 258% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.4104357644 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.6111111111 106.682146367 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3333333333 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.38888888889 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 11.0 5.01903807615 219% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.149341244982 0.244688304435 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0462494739191 0.084324248473 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0634776925076 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0990276078852 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0763859792901 0.056905535591 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.0946893788 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 12.4159519038 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.