The media should include more stories which report good news. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Media has become a particularly important role in human lives recently since it provides people with both national and international updated news. There is an argument that the media should broadcast more good news than bad ones. However, I partly agree with this statement since people need to know not only good things happened but also dark sides of daily lives.
Good stories are essential to carry among hundreds of celebrities’ scandals because they have positive impacts on people. Firstly, good news assists in educating citizens, especially the youth. In fact, watching or listening to a piece of news about people helping each other or people’s achievements helps the young behave more morally and live better lives since they believe that there are still good things happened daily outside. Secondly, people should be informed of new breakthroughs or discoveries which have a significantly good influence on society. For example, hardly is a superstar’s scandal more valuable than the announcement of a new treatment for cancer. Therefore, it is necessary to report good stories on TVs, radios, newspaper, and the Internet as well.
However, it is misguided to restrict the broadcast of tragic news since people have the right to catch up with unfortunate things happened around the world. Civil wars, natural disasters, diseases, accidents and the like may sadden viewers, but they are the reality of today lives. People should keep abreast of these events to have a general knowledge of temporary issues. Moreover, the environment is severely affected by human activities. Consequently, showing news about climate change, soil degradation, endangered animals and pollution takes a great part in warning them that the environment is worse and worse.
From all the above-mentioned, I do believe that both good and bad messages should be shown equally to provide people with a thorough view of what is happening every day. Citizens should absorb the news wisely to gain benefit and protect themselves from unrealistic information.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-30 | sepide1367 | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | martinestefan | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | kiana | 61 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | Niusha | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | lydunhien | 61 | view |
- The table below gives information on households with a regular use of car in Great Britain from 1971 to 2007 85
- The table below shows the percentage of the population by age groups in one town who rode bicycles in 2011. 73
- The line graph shows the percentage of women who were employed in four countries from 1985 to 2005. 84
- The diagrams show the cross-sections of two tunnels, one joining France and Italy and the other joining two Japanese islands 78
- The charts below show the percentage of water used by different sectors in Sydney, Australia, in 1997 and 2007. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 585, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[4]
Message: The adverb 'hardly' is usually put after the verb 'is'.
Suggestion: is hardly
...good influence on society. For example, hardly is a superstar's scandal more valuabl...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, well, for example, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1744.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 323.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39938080495 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92425308796 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.616099071207 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 540.0 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.6416067962 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.0 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1875 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.4375 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245245914313 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0762749447621 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0592303080253 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140742854223 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0564382759852 0.056905535591 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.04 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.47 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.