Some people believe that thechnology has made children less creative than they were in the past
Technology has been a very important part of our life. We use various kinds of thechnology in our daily life such as smart phones, laptops and tablets. Todays children often uses thechnology for entertainment. Some people believe that thechnology has made children less creative than they were in the past; others disegree. In my view, technology has a positive effect on children's creativity for two main reasons.
The main reason is that technology improves way of thinking and focusing. Many devices have been made to entertain children. These smart devices contain various games in diferent levels from hard to easy. Going from a lower level to a higher level needs excersize and focus. By playing with these games, children not only learn to be focus, but they also improve their brain abilities such as learning and memorizing. As a result, children's creativity will improve too. For example, my nephew used to play and work with a laptop as an amusement in his childhood. He gradually learned how to desighn a game. Now, he is a web designer and works for a company although he is just 16 years old. He is realy wellknown for his beautifull and high class designs. If it were not for using technology at his childhood, he would not have had this job opportunity now.
Another reason is that technology make possible to connect with other parts of the world. These days people knows about new inventions by using technology. Technology make chilren familiar with new and interesting inventions in the world. This news make chilren creative. For example, my other nephew loves cars very much. He loves to make his own car with simple things such as thick paper and wood. Every time I meet him, he shows me a new and fashioned car which he has saw in the internet. It means that using technology has made my nephew more creative. In fact, technology is a very good motive factor for encouraging children to think and make new things.
In sum, though some people may limit their children from using computers and smart phones, new technologies would be a good factor in enhancing chilren's creativity. Not only technology improves chilren's abilities to focus and think deeply, but it also enhances their knowledge by making easy connection with the world. Every family should allow their children to be familiar and use technology.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-20 | Zmx_109 | 90 | view |
| 2023-05-01 | aaronahmed | 3 | view |
| 2023-04-21 | sonyeoso | 76 | view |
| 2023-04-19 | Mitra-T | 80 | view |
| 2023-04-19 | Hossein2000 | 88 | view |
- states that R. robustus could not activtly hunt the dinosaur in its stomach for three reasons 60
- which one do you prefer before taking a vacation?Reading about places online or discussing them with someone who has visited the proposed places. 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more important for students to read books about real events than it is for them to read novels. 66
- Some people believe that thechnology has made children less creative than they were in the past 70
- In the reading, the author lists three theories to explain the source which cause the odd noises in the ocean 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 859, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... not have had this job opportunity now. Another reason is that technology make p...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 474, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'sawed', 'sawn', 'seen'.
Suggestion: sawed; sawn; seen
...me a new and fashioned car which he has saw in the internet. It means that using te...
^^^
Line 7, column 153, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d be a good factor in enhancing chilrens creativity. Not only technology improves...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so, well, for example, in fact, such as, as a result, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 40.0 43.0788530466 93% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 52.1666666667 79% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1948.0 1977.66487455 99% => OK
No of words: 397.0 407.700716846 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90680100756 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46372701284 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60228942156 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 212.727598566 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.534005037783 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 600.3 618.680645161 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 20.6003584229 136% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.1344086022 70% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.3446932657 48.9658058833 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 69.5714285714 100.406767564 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.1785714286 20.6045352989 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.45110844103 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 21.0 11.8709677419 177% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213751076372 0.236089414692 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0642823419961 0.076458572812 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.160808245255 0.0737576698707 218% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160986539759 0.150856017488 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.166813664366 0.0645574589148 258% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.8 11.7677419355 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 58.1214874552 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.1575268817 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.61 10.9000537634 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.51 8.01818996416 94% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 86.8835125448 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.002688172 60% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.0537634409 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.