Some people think a job not only provides income but also social life. Others think it is better to develop social life with people you do not work with.
Nowadays, an increasing number of people are concerned about the impact of their occupation on their
personal life, and whether to establish friendships at work or outside of work is still a controversial
issue. My view is that work can be an ideal breeding ground for social relationships.
Firstly, it is obvious that social connections at work can be fostered when there are shared interests
between colleagues. To be more specific, most workers are motivated by money, and therefore, they
share the same goal. This shows that through work, staff can bond together over a shared interest.
Based on that, they can build up a mutual understanding of one another and gradually enhance their
relationship.
Moreover, long hours in the workplace can result in improved bonding between workers. For example,
many Japanese office workers spend up to 8 to 10 hours per day at their company together. During that
time, they are successfully able to cultivate friendship which helps to improve not only their mood and
outlook at work but also their performance.
This is not to say that socialising outside of work is not beneficial. Of course, when making friends from
different walks of life outside of the workplace, people can gain a greater perspective and thus become
a more well-rounded individual. However, building relationships after working hours seems somewhat
impossible since the time available is limited. In my opinion, friendship at work is easier to maintain
compared with outside acquaintances.
To conclude, the workplace can definitely bring many great social opportunities. The public therefore
should start to consider companies and corporations more than just places to make a living.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-23 | Manh1003 | 73 | view |
| 2020-05-04 | thenaolayeu112 | 84 | view |
| 2019-06-15 | Lê Võ Nhật Quang | 67 | view |
| 2019-02-16 | yaldaasgari | 67 | view |
| 2019-02-16 | yaldaasgari | 67 | view |
- Some people think that it is good for a country s culture to import foreign movies and TV programmes Others think that it is better to produce these locally 78
- Nowadays the way people interact with each other has changed because of technology. In what ways has the technology affected the types of relationships people make?Has this become a positive or negative development? 73
- In spite of advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry. 11
- the graph below shows average carbon dioxide (co2) emission per person in the united kingdom, sweden,italy and portugal between 1967 and 2007. 67
- The diagram below shows the process of recycling glass bottles 43
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, look, moreover, so, still, therefore, thus, well, for example, of course, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1471.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 271.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.42804428044 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98265022987 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.638376383764 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 436.5 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.1126009817 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.0666666667 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0666666667 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.46666666667 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 18.0 4.38176352705 411% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.141570568121 0.244688304435 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.044723123843 0.084324248473 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0390850882705 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0452517257442 0.151304729494 30% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.040088014715 0.056905535591 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.