Summarize the reading and the listening
Both the reading and the lecture discuss the increase of salt in lake in The Salton Sea in California. The reading suggests some solutions to solve this problem but the lecturer states that these methods will not be successfully carried out.
To begin with, the author says that directly eliminating salt from the lake's water in special desalination facilities. Nevertheless, the professor claims that this solution will lead to another serious issue. Left materials included types of chemicals which were toxic. When these materials blended into the air people would breath this toxic atmosphere. Therefore, their health would be harmful.
Secondly, the writer tells that mixing water in the lake with water in ocean to dilute the salt level. However, the lecturer opposes this notion by mentioning that the cost of constructing the pipelines was exorbitant. It was about hundred kilometers to convey the ocean water and loads of money must be paid for this.
Finally, the reading conceives that building walls to separate the lake into several sections. The professor argues that this method only functions well for a short-term. Because those walls were located near somewhere had geological activities such as earthquake, they would be collapsed when earthquakes were active again.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?In order to become financially responsible adults, children should learn to manage their own money at a young age. 66
- What factors are essential for students to choose their jobs? 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Parents today are more involved in their children's education than were parents in the past 80
- Summarize the reading and the listening 3
- In order to become financially responsible adults, children should learn to manage their ơn money at a young age. 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Both the reading and the lecture discuss...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... will not be successfully carried out. To begin with, the author says that dire...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 278, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “When” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ed types of chemicals which were toxic. When these materials blended into the air pe...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...refore, their health would be harmful. Secondly, the writer tells that mixing w...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 240, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a hundred'.
Suggestion: a hundred
... pipelines was exorbitant. It was about hundred kilometers to convey the ocean water an...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... loads of money must be paid for this. Finally, the reading conceives that buil...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 165, Rule ID: DT_JJ_NO_NOUN[1]
Message: Probably a noun is missing in this part of the sentence.
...hat this method only functions well for a short-term. Because those walls were located near ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, however, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 30.3222958057 82% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1088.0 1373.03311258 79% => OK
No of words: 203.0 270.72406181 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35960591133 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 4.04702891845 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62255017479 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 145.348785872 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.655172413793 0.540411800872 121% => OK
syllable_count: 328.5 419.366225166 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 21.2450331126 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.9040444745 49.2860985944 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 83.6923076923 110.228320801 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.6153846154 21.698381199 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.84615384615 7.06452816374 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 4.19205298013 167% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0578967014292 0.272083759551 21% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0222029452108 0.0996497079465 22% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.040856045965 0.0662205650399 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0419255189541 0.162205337803 26% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0494040394702 0.0443174109184 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.3589403974 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 53.8541721854 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.51 12.2367328918 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.28 8.42419426049 110% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 63.6247240618 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.7273730684 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.498013245 76% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.