The chart below gives information about the number of social networking sites people used in Canada in 2014 and 2015.
The bar chart provides suffitient information about propotion of people using multiple social networking sites among Canadian people in two diffrent years, 2014 and 2015. Overall, as it can be seen single site is the most prefer used in both years in Canada.
As is given in the chart, the number of people who does not used any social networking sites were about 22% and 21% in 2014 and 2015 respectively. In 2014 Canadian men reach the top percent at all by exactly 36%. In the next year, this propotion was just 28%. two sites users were almost aqual to 23 by one percent more in 2015. There was 12% and 16% of triple social networking sites in 2014 and 2015 respectively. In Canada, users usually did not use more than three social networking sites and annual number for four sites user were about 6.5% miderately, whereas the percent of five sites user were about 3 averagly.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-11-14 | Ieltsbg | 56 | view |
| 2022-11-14 | Ieltsbg | 56 | view |
| 2022-08-29 | Hanabi | view | |
| 2022-01-27 | Chloe Pham | view | |
| 2022-01-19 | koshagohil | 67 | view |
- In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry.Why is this the case?What can be done about this problem? 78
- The bar chart shows the number of visitors to three London Museums between 2007 and 2012. 56
- The diagrams below show the changes that have taken place at West park Secondary School since its construction in 1950. 78
- The table shows the Proportions of Pupils Attending Four Secondary School Types Between 2000 and 2009 56
- The graph shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between1940 and 2040 in three different countries. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 260, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Two
...next year, this propotion was just 28%. two sites users were almost aqual to 23 by ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 725.0 965.302439024 75% => OK
No of words: 157.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.6178343949 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53976893118 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.33706757786 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.592356687898 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 217.8 283.868780488 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 53.2846131637 43.030603864 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.625 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.625 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.875 5.23603664747 36% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.514941952369 0.215688989381 239% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.215003162052 0.103423049105 208% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.167121620753 0.0843802449381 198% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.429999081677 0.15604864568 276% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0186417282413 0.0819641961636 23% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.52 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.29 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.