Government investment in the arts, such as music and theatre, is a waste of money. Governments must invest this money in public services instead. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Many people argue that governments are frittering too much money on arts and they should use their funds on public services instead. In my opinion, I strongly disagree with this viewpoint and both two aspects should be taken into consideration.
On the one hand, authorities should spend money on public services for a variety of reasons. Firstly, education is the most urgent problem in the long run. They should ensure that inhabitants at least know to read and write. Moreover, education systems should be modified by changing school curriculum to suit with science-based society as well as adopting classrooms with highest status technological devices. Secondly, healthcare services should be facilitated through building more hospitals, retirement homes and implementing vaccination programs to eradicate such diseases as: chicken pox, rubella. Finally, unions should involve in public transport systems. Transport network systems should be strictly controlled with a view to reducing carbon dioxide emissions.
On the other hand, I believe that authorities should share some funds with reaction such as: arts, music. It is basically a way of entertaining after a hard working day as it can help them be free from stress, which in turn results in higher working proficiency. In fact, people pursuing these careers can still make huge contributions to their nations if they are well-known worldwide. Take an example of an everlasting picture called Monalisa, has drawn attention of citizens all over the world and has brought its author and America enormous profits. Moreover, BTS, a continental boy band has been making a lot of incomes to Korea through tourism by their popularity.
In conclusion, although some people assume that either creations or public services should be received money from governments, I personally reckon that both have to be taken notice and invested into.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-04 | smiles | 73 | view |
| 2019-07-30 | wardiati | 73 | view |
| 2019-06-24 | hangduan94@gmail.com | 84 | view |
| 2018-09-28 | danial08cse | 89 | view |
| 2018-09-28 | danial08cse | 89 | view |
- In developing countries, children in rural communities have less access to education. Some people believe that the problem can be solved by providing more schools and teachers, while others think that the problem can be solved by providing computers and I 89
- Cycling is a healthy and environmentally friendly form of transport. Nevertheless, cycling is getting less popular. What are the reasons of this trend? What can be done to make cycling more popular? 61
- Individuals should not be allowed to carry guns as it increases the crime and violence in the society. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
- Traffic and housing problems in major cities could be solved by moving large companies and factories and their employees to the countryside To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 65
- Some people think women should be allowed to join the army, the navy and the air force just like men. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 368, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'with the highest'.
Suggestion: with the highest
... society as well as adopting classrooms with highest status technological devices. Secondly,...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, firstly, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, well, at least, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as well as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1599.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.42033898305 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85727524625 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.664406779661 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 477.9 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.7205644965 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.6 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6666666667 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0666666667 7.06120827912 157% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.140243315135 0.244688304435 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0447753262042 0.084324248473 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0605370018231 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0994284750196 0.151304729494 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0575025509368 0.056905535591 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.61 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.