The luxuries and conveniences of contemporary life prevent people from developing into truly strong and independent individuals
To say that the luxuries and conveniences of contemporary life is preventing people from developing into truly strong and independent individuals would be a long stretch. it is the most debated topic when it comes to comparing modern, better lifestyle with the old one. While the statement does bear some truth it is not the absolute truth, there are some aspects that are often overlooked which needs further evaluation.
First, the fact that due to the "contemporary conveniences" women are feeling empowered more than ever is irrefutable. In the olden days, women were not allowed to indulge in various activities, restrained from putting forward their opinions or even step out of the house after certain time. In the modern times all this has changed. Nowadays women can go on world tours due to the various services that the modern world has endowed everyone with. They can easily book a cab or even a hotel to stay on an entirely different part of the world. All this helps in making the person self-serving and strong. Not only women but children also can use these services easily to embark on a life long journey of becoming self-reliant from a very early age.
Second, talking about safety which is paramount to making an individual independent. In the modern world the streets, roads and houses are more secure than ever. due to this sense of security the individual feels more comfortable in carrying out the things and expressing the views that he feels is right for him. The fact that people can do this from the comfort of their homes, which is a benefit of the present-day world, makes the people more independent.
Third, the introduction of social media is also conducive in making people more independent and strong. Through the use of social media people are becoming more and more contumacious which is, one could argue, not a good thing but this goes to show that we are becoming more and more strong and independent.
All in all it would be wrong to assume that the comforts that have been bestowed to us is the Achilles heel that is taking the self-reliance away from us and simultaneously making us weak. it is definitely not a perfect world but la lot better, independent and stronger than the old days.
- Men and women, because of their inherent physical differences, are not equally suited for many tasks. 54
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position 58
- The luxuries and conveniences of contemporary life prevent people from developing into truly strong and independent individuals. 58
- Men and women, because of their inherent physical differences, are not equally suited for many tasks. 54
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 172, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...nt individuals would be a long stretch. it is the most debated topic when it comes...
^^
Line 9, column 163, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Due
...s and houses are more secure than ever. due to this sense of security the individua...
^^^
Line 17, column 190, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...m us and simultaneously making us weak. it is definitely not a perfect world but l...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, look, second, so, third, while, talking about
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 33.0505617978 91% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 58.6224719101 75% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1884.0 2235.4752809 84% => OK
No of words: 385.0 442.535393258 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89350649351 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4296068528 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76582034591 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 215.323595506 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.524675324675 0.4932671777 106% => OK
syllable_count: 582.3 704.065955056 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.8910337029 60.3974514979 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.666666667 118.986275619 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3888888889 23.4991977007 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.72222222222 5.21951772744 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.251397631533 0.243740707755 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0792271502941 0.0831039109588 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.168200460323 0.0758088955206 222% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138777633164 0.150359130593 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.126013036911 0.0667264976115 189% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 14.1392134831 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 48.8420337079 120% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 12.1639044944 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.67 8.38706741573 91% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 100.480337079 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.8971910112 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.