Some people believe that all children should have a pet or an animal to look after. Other people disagree, however, saying that this depends on a child’s circumstances. Consider these opposing views, and give your own opinion.
By changing lifestyle of people from some decades ago, having domestic animals is considerably dwindling. Some are of the opinion that children can have own pet to take care of them. Whilst other do not agree, saying keeping animal should have some restrictions. From my perspective point, offspring can own desired pet, provided some limitation get considered. In the continue both aspect will be discussed.
From the perspective of psychic, psychologist shows that children need to keep animal. Kids to show they are growing, keep animal and build makeshift doll house, etc. Youngsters are in the formative years, needing more supportive attention from their parents to shape their future. One of which is letting them to keep their passion animals. Children are impressionable, and preserving pets can help them to train to get independent.
On the other hand, conducted researches evince that one of the root cause of malady of children is nothing but animal diseases. There are some common sick between animal and human. Some parents opine that only when sanitation and hygiene of animals are allowed for could kids be permitted to keep own pet. For instance, according a research done by Johns Hopkins university, the number of children dying from animal disease has been climaxing recently. Thus, parents aspiring their children keep domestic animals should provide hygienic context to prevent their offspring get malady.
To recapitulate briefly, albeit some parent think keeping animals afford their youngsters the experience of independent living, some believe keeping should be conditional on providing sanitary area. My stand is downright near to the latter view.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-05-21 | Hoainhi2939 | 56 | view |
| 2023-05-21 | Hoainhi2939 | 53 | view |
| 2020-10-18 | lemythue | 67 | view |
| 2019-08-07 | ata | 100 | view |
| 2018-09-27 | nguyenana611 | 72 | view |
- While some people think that the problem with education in poor countries is the teaching methodology used others believe it is the lack of resources that is the real issue Discuss both sides 93
- The maps below show the changes in a town after the construction of a hydroelectric power dam 73
- In many countries women and men are working full time. It is therefore, logical for women and men to share household works. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology In what ways has technology affected personal relationships Has this become a positive or negative development 84
- The charts show the percentage of people working in different sectors in Towns A and B in two years 1960 and 2010 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 366, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...ided some limitation get considered. In the continue both aspect will be discussed. From ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 415, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'getting'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'train' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: getting
... preserving pets can help them to train to get independent. On the other hand, cond...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 151, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'sicks'?
Suggestion: sicks
... animal diseases. There are some common sick between animal and human. Some parents ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
briefly, but, if, so, thus, for instance, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1424.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 263.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.4144486692 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68829628624 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.61216730038 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 435.6 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.7966930421 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.7647058824 106.682146367 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.4705882353 20.7667163134 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.47058823529 7.06120827912 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206820755029 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0718718967183 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0634218098221 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132667500997 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.081886326486 0.056905535591 144% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 50.2224549098 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.8 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.