The graph below shows population figures for India and China since the year 2000 and predicted population growth up until 2050.
The line graph illustrates the increase in population in two countries, namely India and China. The graph also depicts the expected population growth until 2050.
Overall, there is a drastic increase in the population of India, exceeding the population of China. Furthermore, there is a steady increase in the population of China as well.
In the year 2000, while the population of India is around 1000 billion, the population of china was around 1250 billion. According to the graph, there is a sharp increase in the population of India, whereas the population of china increases modestly. The graph shows that the population of India will be equal to the population of china in the year 2030 at around 1450 billion.
This inclination of the population continues in India, and the graph illustrates that the population of India is foreseen to reach 1,600 million in the year 2050. However, there is a slight decrease in the population of china, the population of china shrinks from 1450 billion in the year 2030 to less than 1400 billion in the year 2040 and continues this trend until the year 2050, where the population is anticipated to be around 1400 billion.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-14 | Kien Vu | 78 | view |
| 2019-12-11 | Lai Nhu Phuong | 78 | view |
| 2019-12-05 | faraj27 | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-15 | Nguyen Bao Han | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-13 | cindycornelia98 | 78 | view |
- To understand the most important characteristics of a society, one must study its major cities. 66
- The graph below shows population figures for India and China since the year 2000 and predicted population growth up until 2050. 67
- The table below gives information about languages with the most native speakers. 73
- The table above shows data on the demographics of four nations.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features,and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nticipated to be around 1400 billion.
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, so, well, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 3.97073170732 428% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 983.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98984771574 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72045228319 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 78.0 106.607317073 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.395939086294 0.547539520022 72% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 288.9 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.1454449007 43.030603864 142% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.222222222 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8888888889 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.77777777778 5.23603664747 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.489195314047 0.215688989381 227% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.272732000666 0.103423049105 264% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0513555407556 0.0843802449381 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.349641212163 0.15604864568 224% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0448579002841 0.0819641961636 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.08 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.