In any field of endeavor, it is impossible to make a significant contribution without first being strongly influenced by past achievements within that field.
The success behind any field is definitely driven by the achievements that a person makes, which is based on the fact that whether these achievements have any dependency on the past achievements or not. this is truly based on the point that these past achievements are a driving factor for the individual’s future success rate. So, keeping this in mind, I strongly agree to the claim being made in the prompt, which can be supported by the two reasons.
Firstly, the past achievements in a particular field comes out by showcasing a lot of hard work, diligence along with a strong willpower and determination. By applying these to any field a person is working on, can achieve success. As a result, the individual is able to further justify the grounds that his work is based on, which can be considered as an objective to be sought, for another person particularly in a better way than that. this can be easily understood by an example. Newton, the father of experimental physics, was able to derive the laws of gravitational theory, by illustrating an example, to the world, of a falling able. For the people around him may consider to be the current achievement. But, if we see as the time progressing further, we can able to conclude that many other scientists, keeping that achievement in front of their eyes, are able to able to manipulate the results and come to a different conclusion. Wherein this conclusion may be considered as an achievement that is a crucial factor which gives credence to the success.
another reason is that the past achievements are the only way by which a person while putting forward his/her results can be a factor that can help to eliminate the fallacies behind the reasons that are being made to justify. these mistakes if crept at the process of justification, can render the whole pathway to the success, in a perilous state that can be difficult to bring back to its initial stage. this can be understood by the following example. consider a biologist making a breakthrough in his research in detecting a better way to cure the cancer. Obviously, in this research the researcher has used some past results and then manipulating them to propose the final result, that is considered to be good in the eyes of erudites. this implies that he was able to successfully detect the fallacies of the previous result and thereby leading to a corrected conclusion. we can believe blindly that the mistakes, which were not earlier detected, is successfully analysed by the researcher, is only the important factor that has helped to get the success in future.
In sum, we can be forced to think that these past achievements are the only thing that defines that individual’s success in the future. They can help them to eradicate the wrong assumptions on which the past success may be based on, which may not be considered appropriate for the current fields in which the person is working on, then by considering them he is able to put forward some other and probably the best and the prudent justifications needed for the achievement.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-16 | HAN YEBIN | 50 | view |
| 2024-04-02 | guozhishan | 50 | view |
| 2023-09-01 | Sovendo Talapatra | 50 | view |
| 2023-07-18 | Jonginn | 83 | view |
| 2022-11-04 | raghavchauhan619 | 83 | view |
- The following appeared in a memo from a vice president of Alta Manufacturing. "During the past year, Alta Manufacturing had thirty percent more on-the-job accidents than nearby Panoply Industries, where the work shifts are one hou 69
- A recent sales study indicates that consumption of seafood dishes in Bay City restaurants has increased by 30 percent during the past five years. Yet there are no currently operating city restaurants whose specialty is seafood. Moreover, the majority of f 58
- In any field of endeavor, it is impossible to make a significant contribution without first being strongly influenced by past achievements within that field. 16
- In any field of endeavor, it is impossible to make a significant contribution without first being strongly influenced by past achievements within that field. 66
- The fact that technology is outpacing the needs of those in cultures that can afford the technology creates culture of excess consumerism 65
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 204, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...ndency on the past achievements or not. this is truly based on the point that these ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 440, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...particularly in a better way than that. this can be easily understood by an example....
^^^^
Line 5, column 647, Rule ID: NOUN_AROUND_IT[1]
Message: Consider using 'the surrounding people'?
Suggestion: the surrounding people
...e, to the world, of a falling able. For the people around him may consider to be the current achievem...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 866, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'able to'.
Suggestion: able to
...achievement in front of their eyes, are able to able to manipulate the results and come to a di...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Another
...ich gives credence to the success. another reason is that the past achievements ar...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 227, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: These
...reasons that are being made to justify. these mistakes if crept at the process of jus...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 407, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...ult to bring back to its initial stage. this can be understood by the following exam...
^^^^
Line 9, column 456, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Consider
...be understood by the following example. consider a biologist making a breakthrough in hi...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 742, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...red to be good in the eyes of erudites. this implies that he was able to successfull...
^^^^
Line 9, column 879, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: We
...reby leading to a corrected conclusion. we can believe blindly that the mistakes, ...
^^
Line 9, column 1062, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...ctor that has helped to get the success in future. In sum, we can be forced to think...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, may, so, then, while, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 36.0 19.5258426966 184% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 14.8657303371 47% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 28.0 11.3162921348 247% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 49.0 33.0505617978 148% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 79.0 58.6224719101 135% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2561.0 2235.4752809 115% => OK
No of words: 528.0 442.535393258 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85037878788 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.79356345386 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95072536159 2.79657885939 106% => OK
Unique words: 230.0 215.323595506 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.435606060606 0.4932671777 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 801.0 704.065955056 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.5904330064 60.3974514979 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.05 118.986275619 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.4 23.4991977007 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.9 5.21951772744 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 11.0 7.80617977528 141% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0617054003654 0.243740707755 25% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0249149821776 0.0831039109588 30% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0193436969867 0.0758088955206 26% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0445117264265 0.150359130593 30% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0102233754439 0.0667264976115 15% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 14.1392134831 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 48.8420337079 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 12.1639044944 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 100.480337079 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.8971910112 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.