The graph below shows the total value of exports and the value of fuel, food and manufactured goods exported by one country from 2000 to 2005.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
This chart illustrates several products to exports from 2000 to 2005. Those products are fuel, food, and manufacturer goods. This graph provides information in million dollars. Overall, total growth of export products at the end of 2005 were increased. These can indicates risen of economically growth in the future.
Fuel was the most popular value to export in 2000, but there was significantly decline to 20.000 million dollars throughout 5 years. On the other hand, the trend of export food was fluctuating. This showed by rose in 2000 to 2002 and then dropped to 20.000 million dollars in 2003. 3 years later, consumed product was steadily incline.
Conversely, manufactured goods were less selected to export to other countries, stood at below 10.000 millions dollars for 5 years. The line graph showed consistently and fluctuated a bit. The amount of manufactured goods were exported in 2000 and 2005 leveled off.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-27 | cindycornelia98 | 56 | view |
| 2019-09-02 | jjferns | 73 | view |
| 2019-07-09 | Sreeveni Das | 56 | view |
| 2019-05-15 | kimmie | 56 | view |
| 2019-01-31 | gatau4 | 67 | view |
- The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The bar chart shows the scores of teams A,B and C over four different seasons. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- The graph below shows the total value of exports and the value of fuel, food and manufactured goods exported by one country from 2000 to 2005.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as posible in scientific research business and the academic world Other believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely Discuss both these views and give y 61
- In general, people do not have such a close relationship with their neighbours as they did in the past.Why is this so, and what can be done to improve contact between neighbours? 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 161, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
...ods. This graph provides information in million dollars. Overall, total growth of expor...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 264, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'indicate'
Suggestion: indicate
...e end of 2005 were increased. These can indicates risen of economically growth in the fut...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 328, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'inclined'.
Suggestion: inclined
...rs later, consumed product was steadily incline. Conversely, manufactured goods were ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, if, then, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 779.0 965.302439024 81% => OK
No of words: 149.0 196.424390244 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22818791946 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.49378814695 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75486801487 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.637583892617 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 215.1 283.868780488 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 12.0 22.4926829268 53% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.0692270956 43.030603864 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 64.9166666667 112.824112599 58% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 12.4166666667 22.9334400587 54% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 3.66666666667 5.23603664747 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.307668754613 0.215688989381 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10888228035 0.103423049105 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0656756131293 0.0843802449381 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.202835181911 0.15604864568 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0442722338451 0.0819641961636 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 13.2329268293 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.22 61.2550243902 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.6 10.3012195122 54% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 12.17 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 11.4329268293 52% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.8 10.9970731707 62% => OK
text_standard: 6.0 11.0658536585 54% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.