Governments should spend more money on railways rather than roads.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
As transportation plays a key role in the development of societies, it has been a matter of many controversies. While many believe that governments should invest more in railroads, others believe that roads are as important. I personally believe that rail systems should be prioritized over roads for the matter of sustainability and cost-effectiveness.
Trains are more economical modes of transportations. On the one hand, their maintenance and operational costs are far less than road transport, on the other hand, they offer cheaper fees for commuters. Although railway network, as a luxurious infrastructure for some developing countries, requires larger amounts of investment, in the long run, the lower maintenance and operational costs make it a considerably cost-effective choice. Furthermore, as trains, LRTs and subways can transport myriads of commuters at one, they offer cheaper and more economical fees for users, making them the first choice of many.
Railways make a great contribution to enhancing sustainability. Firstly, since trains and subways usually work with electricity, they are more sustainable and environmentally friendly. Secondly, rail transport can carry a large number of commuters that in comparison to road vehicles uses much less energy. In addition, it is a proven fact that building more road networks leads to stimulating the latent demand for road vehicles, which is hindered by traffic congestion. This means investment in roads leads to an exponential rise in car trips, increasing fossil fuel consumption.
In conclusion, I do believe that policymakers should invest more in train systems because they are more sustainable and financially justifiable.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-30 | sepide1367 | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | martinestefan | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | kiana | 61 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | Niusha | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | lydunhien | 61 | view |
- Excessive consumption of sugar causes many health related issues. Some people believe the government should control population’s sugar intake while others think people themselves should be responsible for their sugar eating habits. Discuss both views an 73
- Some people say that the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sports facilities. Others, however, say that this would have little effect on public health and that other measures are required. 73
- Demand for food is increasing worldwide. What is the cause of this? What measures can the international community take to meet this demand? 78
- Governments should spend more money on railways rather than roads.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- Some people think that the government should provide free education at every level However some say individuals should pay for their university education Discuss both views and give your opinion 82
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 221, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...dly. Secondly, rail transport can carry a large number of commuters that in comparison to road ve...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, while, in addition, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1449.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 256.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.66015625 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.43961005906 2.80592935109 123% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.609375 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 440.1 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.7835028797 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.461538462 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6923076923 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.61538461538 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.107898788672 0.244688304435 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.042402491098 0.084324248473 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0408437284147 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0788468503386 0.151304729494 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0384166063318 0.056905535591 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.55 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.39 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.