The tradition that the family gets together to eat meals is disappearing. What are the reasons? What are the impacts?
With the significant change of lifestyle today, eating meals together in a family becomes more and more difficult. Besides, there are numerous of reasons put forward to explain for this issue. The following reasons are various consequences to children and family life.
At first, the reason for the disappearance of family meals comes from children’s disobedience when they never listen and follow their parents’ guidance. Simply, the children always want to enjoy their meals in front of the television or computer with their favourite program instead of having lunch or dinner time with their parents. Moreover, instability in the family model might be a reason in the case, especially the close-knit family one is no longer promoted as a priority. Therefore, in some single-parent households that they must spend almost time working at offices, it is not easy for all members to have mealtimes.
As the consequences, lacking mealtimes together causes problems related to health, especially with children, as well as affects negatively to family’s life. From the perspective of children’s health as growth, they would lose important lessons from their parents that are only happened in mealtimes. In addition, children not enjoying meals with their parents also make them face disadvantages in shaping their personality for some formative years. In terms of family life, mealtimes together can create a good habit in connection and sympathy. In some countries, family meals are deemed to be a sacred daily activity engaging all members together. So, no family mealtime means cultural valuation is negatively fading day by day.
In conclusion, traditional meals are disappearing today because of many reasons affected by changes in lifestyle. The consequences resulted are obvious in children’s health and family’s life.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | The Lazy Tiger | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-15 | hammy | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-05 | Anh Nguyen 2604 | 84 | view |
| 2019-10-01 | nhathoa | 90 | view |
| 2019-07-02 | ngotrancamtu | 61 | view |
- The only way to improve safety on our roads is to give much stricter punishments for driving offences.What extent do you agree or disagree? 89
- The tradition that the family gets together to eat meals is disappearing. What are the reasons? What are the impacts? 73
- Some people think that schools should reward students who show the best academic results, while others believe that it is more important to reward students who show improvements.Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 556, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... good habit in connection and sympathy. In some countries, family meals are deemed...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, in addition, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1578.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 283.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.57597173145 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07757826377 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.586572438163 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 492.3 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.0538136223 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.2 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8666666667 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183057031936 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.071913474833 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.048841187645 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135448645517 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0402621770649 0.056905535591 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.08 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.