Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect. In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?
— Interrupt and correct the mistake right away.
— Wait until the class or meeting is over and the people are gone, and then talk to the teacher or meeting leader.
— Say nothing.
There is no shortage of opinion on what attitude I would express on the situation. In my opinion, correcting the shortcoming instantly is definitive solution to the problem. I feel this way for three main reasons, and I will develop these ideas in the subsequent paragraphs.
Firstly, I will prevent others students or people who is attending the meeting by correcting the failure. Therefore, they will avoid misconception, that may lead to significant problem later since having a wrong understanding of things tend to occasion bigger and more relentless fault. I have to admit that my opinion on this matter is heavily influenced by my own experience. Last year, I was attending the mathematics class and recognized that professor solved the problem by using inappropriate formula. However, I kept quiet in order to circumvent from disrupting class. Unfortunately, on the midterm exam, entire class except me failed to solve the problem which required the usage of formula, which was explained incorrectly in the class. If I had addressed the solution to the professor and classmates, I would have helped them to pass the test. Drawing from my own experience, correcting the mistake immediately will help others to exclude wrong or unnecessary information.
Secondly, individuals will be noticed by the professor or meeting manager if they propose correct interpretation to the matter which had discussed improperly. Thereby, their possibility of having better relationship and getting inmate to other will increase because others will consider them well-informed. For example, in the latest session, my friend said he amended his executive's statement about the project during the meeting. Because the improvement on the topic discussed was adequately and professionally, the others were enchanted by his knowledge and savvy. Afterwards, others started treating him cordially, and he was promoted because people's attitude towards him was significantly influenced by his words on the discussing. In consequence, stressing the wrong statement and proposing possible solution help individuals to show up their knowledge or ability, which will improve the communication between people in the meeting or lecture hall.
To sum up, I am of the opinion that I would discontinue the discussion and rectify the incorrect statement in this particular situation. This is because I will help others to avoid any misconception, and I will be recognized and respected by others.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-14 | Zmx_6 | 76 | view |
| 2023-07-12 | Zmx_6 | 80 | view |
| 2023-06-28 | Vivian Chang | 70 | view |
| 2023-03-22 | sonyeoso | 76 | view |
| 2023-02-20 | m.ghoroobi | 76 | view |
- TPO 29 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement To improve the quality of education universities should spend more money on salaries for university professors 85
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 80
- It is sometimes said that borrowing money from a friend can harm or damage the friendship Do you agree Why or why not Use reasons and specific examples to explain your answer 70
- TPO 30 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is better to go on a trip by oneself than to take a group tour with a guide Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, for example, i feel, in my opinion, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 43.0788530466 95% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 52.1666666667 94% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.0752688172 211% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2091.0 1977.66487455 106% => OK
No of words: 384.0 407.700716846 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.4453125 4.8611393121 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4267276788 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16687118138 2.67179642975 119% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 212.727598566 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.533854166667 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 651.6 618.680645161 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.0095443256 48.9658058833 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.052631579 100.406767564 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2105263158 20.6045352989 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.21052631579 5.45110844103 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.117309148125 0.236089414692 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0384723554973 0.076458572812 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0412334967578 0.0737576698707 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0677525389827 0.150856017488 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0329586259742 0.0645574589148 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 11.7677419355 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 58.1214874552 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.33 10.9000537634 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.4 8.01818996416 117% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 86.8835125448 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.