Some people get into debt by buying things they do not need and cannot afford. What are the reasons for this behavior? What action can be taken to prevent people from having this problem?
In our contemporary world, shopping is becoming imprescriptible part of our existence which is leading this issue to become matter of considerable controversy. And in today’s confabulation one school of thought surmise that, myriad of people confronting problem like making expenditure for bootless stuff which they have not definite necessity. And my essay below will analyze some major reasons for this situation, and measures to tackle this problem will be presented.
Incipiently advertisement is the primary factor which captivates consumer’s attention to unnecessary products. As famous brands nowadays which are simultaneously broadcasting by TV can magnetize people despite of their financial background. Secondly imitation to famous actors and musicians can be important catalysts for youngsters. For those who follow their styles nonstop, price and necessity of this product would be totally blurred. Last but not least is that one can show his superiority by products which are extravagant. For instance, affluent people with latest modes of gadgets and clothes could easily gain enough bumptiousness over others.
And in order to stem the tide of this problem, individuals must give up competition with each other which nowadays leading them to discrimination. As by that way perspective would be kept in equilibrium by not showing their financial status for families from poorer background. Secondly, in order to prevent people from imitation and following numerous adverts which are produced by TV, government should control the companies who are responsible for manufacturing stuff which serve necessity of population and should restrict some adverts which are useless for population.
To conclude, it is crystally clear that superiority and imitation lead individuals to purchase for bootless products and by stopping dispensable competitions and restricting useless ads they can prevent people from it.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-02-09 | mhienle | 61 | view |
| 2023-02-02 | Raspreet s. | 78 | view |
| 2023-02-02 | Harman97 | 73 | view |
| 2022-03-12 | monmon12345 | 89 | view |
| 2021-12-06 | nganphuong05 | 73 | view |
- Some people think that it is more beneficial to take part in sports which are played in teams like football while other people think that taking part in individual sports like tennis or swimming is better Discuss both views and give your own opinion 56
- The chart below shows the value of one country s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016 The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015 73
- There is a moral necessity today for the richer countries of the world top help the poorer countries develop in terms of feeding the population education and health care 78
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide emissions per person in the United Kingdom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 78
- Some people regard video games as harmless fun or even as a useful educational tool Others however believe that videos games are having an adverse effect on the people who play them In your opinion do the drawbacks of video games outweigh the benefits 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 111, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...er’s attention to unnecessary products. As famous brands nowadays which are simult...
^^
Line 2, column 560, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'with the latest'.
Suggestion: with the latest
...ravagant. For instance, affluent people with latest modes of gadgets and clothes could easi...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, second, secondly, so, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1643.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.74475524476 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12672857958 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.608391608392 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 497.7 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.2479082043 49.4020404114 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.384615385 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 7.06120827912 42% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.24970383575 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0852118185228 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0498827497866 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158295237358 0.151304729494 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0295015727459 0.056905535591 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.0946893788 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.01 12.4159519038 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.75 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.