Some people believe that teaching morality should be the foundation of education. Others believe that teaching a foundation of logical reasoning would do more to produce a moral society.
Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented above
Education of the "youth" is very vital for securing a nation's future. We must strive to provide a multi-dimensional education which could inculcate the skills and make him/her a better human being. The prompt presents a dilemma about teaching morality or logical reasoning, which should be the base of education. In my opinion, I mostly agree with the assertion and have a predilection for logical reasoning, along with certain reservation for morality, for these reasons.
First of all, it is imperative to be logically sound to survive in this ever increasing globalized world. One must not let emotions take our his/her conscience which could impair his ability to discern. It would enable one to reach correct decision based on merit, and not emotional quotient. For instance, a judiciary judge takes a decision based on logical reasoning and facts. It enables him to do justice in a disinterested manner. He/she cannot afford to use his morality which would endenger prejudice. Thus, logically reasoning must be the foundation of education.
Secondly, being logical makes one pragmatic. Without following a practical approach, one cannot discern the situation's veracity, leading him/her to a fallacious path. Research has consistently demonstrated that a person following a pragmatic approach, is more likely to succeed than others. For instance, a candidate having an average grade should not dream to get into Ivy league and rather strive to target the propitious universitites, which is aligned with his grades. Thus, we must enable the kids to be adept with logical reasoning through education.
However, we cannot ignore morality entirely. A person must have basic moral values to be genuous enough. I'm not affirming that morality should take a toll on logical reasoning, but it certainly helps to become a better human being. For instance, a leader who is well adept to lead well based on his logically driven decision making cannot surmount if he/she is not humane.
Of course, some might argue that morality preceeds logical reasoning and this is more necessary. However, it is not the case. I do agree that some professions needs one to think morally instead of logically, but again, it is limited to few fields such as healthcare and politics. In most cases, we need a proper mixture of both the values in our education to make children a better human being. Thus, we should opt for both morality and logical reasoning as the foundation of education.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-07 | ekarumeblessing@icloud.com | 70 | view |
| 2023-09-21 | RIYA MODI | 58 | view |
| 2023-09-02 | jayatyagi123@yahoo.co.in | 50 | view |
| 2023-04-07 | Aaishani De | 66 | view |
| 2022-11-21 | raghavchauhan619 | 62 | view |
- It is more important to keep your old friends than to make new friends 70
- The following appeared in a letter from the faculty committee to the president of Seatown University A study conducted at nearby Oceania University showed that faculty retention is higher when professors are offered free tuition at the university for thei 59
- Governments should invest as much in the arts as they do in the military Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and support 50
- Manned space flight is costly and dangerous Moreover the recent success of a series of unmanned space probes and satellites has demonstrated that a great deal of useful information can be gathered without the costs and risks associated with sending men an 50
- A recent study indicates that children living in the Himalayan mountain region in Nepal have lower levels of tooth decay than children living in suburban areas in the United States despite the fact that people in the Himalayan mountain region in Nepal rec 58
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 410, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a disinterested manner" with adverb for "disinterested"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...and facts. It enables him to do justice in a disinterested manner. He/she cannot afford to use his morali...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 109, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'situations'' or 'situation's'?
Suggestion: situations'; situation's
...ctical approach, one cannot discern the situations veracity, leading him/her to a fallacio...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 106, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: I'm
...asic moral values to be genuous enough. Im not affirming that morality should take...
^^
Line 7, column 332, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... on his logically driven decision making cannot surmount if he/she is not humane....
^^
Line 9, column 234, Rule ID: TO_TOO[2]
Message: Did you mean 'too'?
Suggestion: too
... of logically, but again, it is limited to few fields such as healthcare and polit...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, thus, well, for instance, of course, such as, first of all, in most cases, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 12.4196629213 153% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 33.0505617978 115% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 58.6224719101 73% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 12.9106741573 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2088.0 2235.4752809 93% => OK
No of words: 402.0 442.535393258 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19402985075 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47771567384 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87684389329 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 215.323595506 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.519900497512 0.4932671777 105% => OK
syllable_count: 674.1 704.065955056 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 6.24550561798 208% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.823717427 60.3974514979 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.52 118.986275619 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.08 23.4991977007 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.4 5.21951772744 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.253472796346 0.243740707755 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0744449572385 0.0831039109588 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.064588566918 0.0758088955206 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145803457071 0.150359130593 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0378817697921 0.0667264976115 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 14.1392134831 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 48.8420337079 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.1639044944 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 100.480337079 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 410, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a disinterested manner" with adverb for "disinterested"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...and facts. It enables him to do justice in a disinterested manner. He/she cannot afford to use his morali...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 109, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'situations'' or 'situation's'?
Suggestion: situations'; situation's
...ctical approach, one cannot discern the situations veracity, leading him/her to a fallacio...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 106, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: I'm
...asic moral values to be genuous enough. Im not affirming that morality should take...
^^
Line 7, column 332, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... on his logically driven decision making cannot surmount if he/she is not humane....
^^
Line 9, column 234, Rule ID: TO_TOO[2]
Message: Did you mean 'too'?
Suggestion: too
... of logically, but again, it is limited to few fields such as healthcare and polit...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, thus, well, for instance, of course, such as, first of all, in most cases, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 12.4196629213 153% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 33.0505617978 115% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 58.6224719101 73% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 12.9106741573 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2088.0 2235.4752809 93% => OK
No of words: 402.0 442.535393258 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19402985075 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47771567384 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87684389329 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 215.323595506 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.519900497512 0.4932671777 105% => OK
syllable_count: 674.1 704.065955056 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 6.24550561798 208% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.823717427 60.3974514979 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.52 118.986275619 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.08 23.4991977007 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.4 5.21951772744 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.253472796346 0.243740707755 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0744449572385 0.0831039109588 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.064588566918 0.0758088955206 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145803457071 0.150359130593 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0378817697921 0.0667264976115 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 14.1392134831 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 48.8420337079 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.1639044944 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 100.480337079 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.