The real talent of a popular musician cannot accurately be assessed until the musician has been dead for several generations, so that his or her fame does not interfere with honest assessment.
The above argument mentions that the endemic species of West Lansburg namely called tufter groundhog lives on the coastal wetlands there. In 2004, it was declared as a wildlife sanctuary so development along the coastal wetlands was prohibited. Despite the prohibition of development, the local development interests are lobbying to allow access roads to be built across the periphery of the wetlands. But in the letter to the editor it says that in order to preserve the biodiversity and ecology the permission should not be granted as it would impede the healthy and verdant sanctuary. But the letter has many flaws and certainly depends on many assumptions which are meretricious.
The letter states that Neighbouring Eastern Carpenteria is a similar sanctuary and it has seen the same situation where it ratified the local development to build roads along the periphery and as result they faced decline of the native sea otter population. But here clearly an assumption is made that as Eastern Carpenteria suffered from decline of sea otter population there would also be the same impact on the West Lansburg if they would give the permission to build roads surrounding the sanctuary. Here it is not necessary that the sea otter population have depleted because of the manufacturing of roads. There can be a myriad of reasons behind it such as native people living around have started eating those due to the health benefits and as a reason the decrease of the population took place.
Secondly there maybe a possibility that the Neighbouring Eastern Carpenteria sanctuary have seen the decrease in population because of the squalid atmosphere present around sanctuary. The sea otter populations may have not been able to survive such filthy surroundings and bad oxygen and as a result of this, they have deteriorated in their population. So, there cannot be direct implication that as conditions on building roads across this sanctuary can also have the same deleterious effects in the West Lansburg sanctuary.
Thirdly, it is mentioned that West Lansburg should brusquely deny the offer of the local developments to ensure the ecology. But here it has been presumed that the development persons would have parlous motives and that would degenerate the sanctuary. It is certainly flawed as there maybe a situation where they are optimistic about the ecology too and they are developing the roads around the periphery to genuinely help in overall productivity of the sanctuary. There can also be a motive that they want to build roads around so that more humans can become aware of this sanctuary and its existence. Because as more people would be conversant it would augment the ecology and such biodiversity as people would protect it by not cutting it down.
So, the letter mentioned here totally depends on assumptions and can be reframed by removing the direct implied relations with the Neighbouring Eastern Carpenteria sanctuary. Also, a detailed discussion with the local development agents can help enhance the understanding of the motives and reasons of why to construct such roads. Lastly, a document can also be created between the local development agents and the people who manage the sanctuary that there would be no destruction of the ecology and biodiversity on building roads around the sanctuary. This will also help to build cordial relationship between them.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-03 | Gbangbala Usman | 58 | view |
| 2023-08-28 | Gnyana | 50 | view |
| 2023-08-17 | Jbrachael | 66 | view |
| 2023-08-05 | Ataraxia-m | 62 | view |
| 2023-08-05 | Ataraxia-m | 50 | view |
- The tufted groundhog lives in the coastal wetlands of West Lansburg Ancient records suggest that the tufted groundhog once numbered in the millions Since they were declared a wildlife sanctuary in 2004 development along the coastal wetlands has been prohi 58
- The real talent of a popular musician cannot accurately be assessed until the musician has been dead for several generations so that his or her fame does not interfere with honest assessment 16
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... assumptions which are meretricious. The letter states that Neighbouring East...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rease of the population took place. Secondly there maybe a possibility that ...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ects in the West Lansburg sanctuary. Thirdly, it is mentioned that West Lansb...
^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d protect it by not cutting it down. So, the letter mentioned here totally de...
^^^^^^
Line 10, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ild cordial relationship between them.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, lastly, may, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 21.0 12.4196629213 169% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.3162921348 150% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 33.0505617978 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 64.0 58.6224719101 109% => OK
Nominalization: 24.0 12.9106741573 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2850.0 2235.4752809 127% => OK
No of words: 549.0 442.535393258 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1912568306 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.84053189512 4.55969084622 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85082664922 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 215.323595506 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.402550091075 0.4932671777 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 900.0 704.065955056 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.2087768752 60.3974514979 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.714285714 118.986275619 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1428571429 23.4991977007 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.09523809524 5.21951772744 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.056127513569 0.243740707755 23% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0203083279533 0.0831039109588 24% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0209048934636 0.0758088955206 28% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0382125191829 0.150359130593 25% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0143190895 0.0667264976115 21% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 14.1392134831 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 48.8420337079 92% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 12.1639044944 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 123.0 100.480337079 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.