Some people think the money spent in developing the technology for space exploration is not justified. There are more beneficial ways to spend this money. To what extend do you agree or disagree?
It is often assumed that investment in space exploration development is money squandering. While I disagree with the opinion, I believe that money should be spent on other fields that play a more integral part.
On the one hand, as environmental degradation has posed a threat to living conditions, it is becoming more and more common for the civilization to expect a new planet. In fact, chemical waste discharged into rivers or a dramatic rise witnessed in the total of carbon emissions has an adverse bearing on the environment. As a result, it is plausible for the national and local authorities to raise public spending on space exploration.
On the other hand, I firmly hold the opinion that pecuniary resources should be used wisely in order to combat some more serious problems. First of all, the subsidy is a major factor that should be paid more attention to. For example, the magnitude and frequency of extreme weather events have made food production highly vulnerable, and thus not only the food industry experiences a high probability of risks but also the farm holders would face budget deficits. Therefore, the state should increase the provision of subsidies to help people cope with the poor situation. Another difficult problem is to enhance the outcomes of health care. During the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic, if the governments took action proactively on its serious influence by investing in improving hospitals and providing masks for figures, some nations would overcome the disease soon. Also, saving money for medical infrastructures and necessary subsidies before the pandemic taking place might help mitigate its huge damage.
All in all, although the aim of investing in space exploration is to strive towards a potential habitat, I believe entirely that in this day and age, diminishing environmental problems and alleviating an epidemic’s consequence should take precedence over space exploration.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-06 | TLan168 | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-27 | Zeroplague0407 | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-26 | Vivi_peach | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-24 | hyentie | 89 | view |
| 2023-07-24 | hyentie | 89 | view |
- In many countries today there are many highly qualified graduates without employment What factors may have caused this situation and what in your opinion can should be done about it 56
- With the rapid advancement of communication technology eg smart phones tablets and other mobile devices some people believe that the disadvantages outweigh the advantages To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Some people think that job satisfaction is more important than job security while some people think that they cannot always expect job satisfaction a permanent job is more important Discuss both views and give your own opinion 56
- Some people think the money spent in developing the technology for space exploration is not justified There are more beneficial ways to spend this money To what extend do you agree or disagree 89
- The bar chart shows the percentage of the total world population in 4 countries in 1950 and 2003 and projections for 2050 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant https ieltsonlinetests com
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, in fact, as a result, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1641.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 309.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31067961165 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95669282244 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.631067961165 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 524.7 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.6617994774 49.4020404114 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.230769231 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7692307692 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.92307692308 7.06120827912 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203667251867 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0675758561159 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0604122805712 0.0667982634062 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128486274152 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0718299370097 0.056905535591 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.99 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.