Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today.
In the last fifty years, the number of cars has used in developing and developed countries in the world has been increasing. Despite this process is continuing, some scientists think that in twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today. I totally agree that in the near future the number of cars in use will decrease. Not only Inventing new public transports with high technology but also increasing the number of them encourage people to use their cars fewer. I will shed light on my reasons in the following paragraphs.
To begin with, the technology quickly moves forward. Obviously, more technology progresses, more convenient facilities are invented. One of these facilities is new public transport which is faster and more comfortable than the old-fashioned one. Due to these two advantages, people prefer to use private transport fewer. Support for this idea came from a study conducted in South Korean University. According to the study just after two months of operating air trains in Seoul the volume of traffic dramatically reduced in the rush hour. Also, the result showed that over 35 percent of people did not use their personal vehicles and prefer to communicate with air trains. Saving more time, paying lower prices and being more comfortable in comparison to personal vehicles were the main reasons which people mentioned for their preference.
Second, in recent years, the concern about global warming and making plans to decrease greenhouse gases emission have increased. In this regard, one of the plans, in order to reduce greenhouse gasses emission, is that countries raise the amount of annual budget for public transport. High numbers of public transports solves the major problems such as a large population in them, which is the main reason makes people do not like to use public transport, so people persuade to communicate with them. Countries duplicate the amount of public transport budget and, according to an agreement, countries have to increase it every year. By rising the number of public transport people more tend to use them and estimated that the number of cars in use will decrease.
In conclusion, inventing new public transport with high technology and increasing the number of public transport are two significant factors which most probably lead to reducing the number of cars in use than today in twenty years. Regarding adverse effects of cars on air quality and environment, scientists and governments should cooperate to find other effective solutions and operate them in societies.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-14 | Astha101 | 70 | view |
| 2023-07-14 | Astha101 | 66 | view |
| 2023-06-23 | YasamanEsml | 76 | view |
| 2023-04-13 | sonyeoso | 76 | view |
| 2023-04-08 | prakriti malla | 73 | view |
- School teachers have found that this year more and more students copy homework from others which one of the following choices is the best way to reduce this phenomenon 1 Parents should supervise their children s study and homework and sigh their names to 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The way people dress is a good indication of his or her personality or character 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Students who keep their rooms neat and organized will be more likely to succeed than students who do not 66
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The most important goal of education is to teach people how to educate themselves 81
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 475, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'communicating'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'persuade' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: communicating
...se public transport, so people persuade to communicate with them. Countries duplicate the amou...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, regarding, second, so, in conclusion, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 43.0788530466 51% => OK
Preposition: 69.0 52.1666666667 132% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2144.0 1977.66487455 108% => OK
No of words: 415.0 407.700716846 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16626506024 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51348521516 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69494561938 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 212.727598566 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.518072289157 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 660.6 618.680645161 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.59856630824 21% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.94265232975 223% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.6974035681 48.9658058833 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.2 100.406767564 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.75 20.6045352989 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.75 5.45110844103 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.243386933135 0.236089414692 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0797515646651 0.076458572812 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0919533803475 0.0737576698707 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171874829113 0.150856017488 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.124974810505 0.0645574589148 194% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 11.7677419355 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 10.9000537634 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 86.8835125448 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.