Some believe that charitable organizations should help people no matter where they live. Others argue that charities should only help those living in the country where the charity is based. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
In recent times, a plethora of non-profit NGOs have developed to provide assistance to those in need. Whether this support should be limited to a country's borders or should be provided worldwide regardless of any nationality is open for dispute. This essay will outline both of these opinions followed by my point of view.
On the one hand, if charitable organizations offer help at an international level, local people who are in need and suffering might get ignored. This is because, the focus area for such organizations would be of a wide range. So, more attention would be gathered by large calamities. Thus, charities aiding domestic people within their own country would be more beneficial for alleviating sufferings of local population. Take CUPA, for example, which is an NGO in India that provides shelter to stray dogs in different cities of the country. This service could be difficult if attempted to provide at an international level. Moreover, the transportation as well as import/export expenses to help foreign countries could be costlier for small charities.
On the other hand, during unfortunate times of natural or man-made disasters such as, floods, droughts, earthquakes, and chemical explosions in factories, the collaboration of international charitable organizations is required to assist people who suffer. To exemplify, Khalsa Aid, a non-profitable organization in India, have been aiding different countries in difficult times by providing food, shelter and money. It is incontrovertible that restricting the support provided by charities to a nation's borders could be precarious in such cases. Therefore, some NGOs must extend their contribution towards other countries as well.
Having seen both the views, from my perspective, it can be concluded that although domestic assistance is required to be provided by small NGOs, some charities should also lend a helping hand to needy people regardless of their country or location.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-01-02 | drmona.914 | 89 | view |
| 2022-03-23 | Amityy | 67 | view |
| 2021-05-17 | gur1040894 | 56 | view |
| 2021-04-04 | sanimer gill | 56 | view |
| 2021-04-04 | sanimer gill | 56 | view |
- Many small local shops are closing as they are unable to compete with the large supermarkets in the area How does this effect local communities How could this situation be improved 84
- The diagrams below show the water supply system in Australia at present and in future Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features 87
- The bar chart shows the percentage of international students enrolled in British universities in two years 1990 and 2014 75
- Many people think that some individuals are naturally good leader Others think that people can learn leadership skills Discuss both views 90
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, well, for example, in fact, such as, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1663.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 305.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.45245901639 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16432342805 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583606557377 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 514.8 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.9175583635 49.4020404114 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.866666667 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3333333333 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.46666666667 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173750040687 0.244688304435 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0580249048364 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0441715594544 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119700133448 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0274046463789 0.056905535591 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.33 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.44 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, well, for example, in fact, such as, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1663.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 305.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.45245901639 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16432342805 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583606557377 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 514.8 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.9175583635 49.4020404114 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.866666667 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3333333333 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.46666666667 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173750040687 0.244688304435 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0580249048364 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0441715594544 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119700133448 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0274046463789 0.056905535591 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.33 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.44 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.