Some feel executives in large companies should receive high salaries while others think they are paid too much compared to ordinary workers.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Without a shadow of a doubt, with the galloping augmentation and a foot progression in societies, we are going through some upheaval-causing issues influencing all zeniths and nadirs of our quotidian life. One of them occurs in new advent colossal industrial estates. Needless to say that in these establishments, there exist some discriminations, e.g. the difference in remuneration of miscellaneous echelons. According to some, it is the limpid right of high-ranked managers to get more wages and it should compound. Notwithstanding, others put forward in comparison to simple workers, executives receive an adequately high salary. From my standpoint, I downright and wholeheartedly go for the latter credence. But, both facets will be discussed succinctly.
“lying at the top of hierarchy brings more right and salary, it is an exclusive right of them” is commonly acclaimed by the proponent of the former notion. First and foremost, this level of managers puts up with more stress regarding the projects, whether they are in progress or will commence in the impending future. Moreover, they are responsible for all walks of life of their workers, ranging from health-related issues to more efficacious throughput. To this end, executives should receive more than enough remuneration and bounces, thanks to the responsibilities, inflicted on their shoulders.
Meanwhile, those who are opponents of the aforementioned idea consciously and firmly aver that “enough is enough”. To further address this issue and imbibe it. It worth noting that workers behold at this matter from a different lens, which is nothing but we, human beings, are created from the same flesh and blood. In this sense, under any circumstances is no inequality tolerated and stomached, whatsoever. Thus, organizers are allowed to secure wage just up to a limited extend more than ordinary workers, according to their extra work.
To recapitulate what has gone, one group is of the opinion that high-ranked incumbents should receive more remuneration and reimbursement owing to their grave duties. Nonetheless, others genuinely opine it is unfair and injustice, so do I. And we could not help deeming and acquiescing with this unwelcome phenomenon, irrefutably leading to the abyssal chasm of segregation between high- and low-ranked workers.
- Some observers say that police officer should be recruited from the communities where they work so that they have local knowledge Other people say that this is unnecessary or even undesirable Where do you stand on this debate Is local knowledge essential 73
- While some people think that the problem with education in poor countries is the teaching methodology used others believe it is the lack of resources that is the real issue Discuss both sides 93
- It is sometimes said that the countryside offers a high quality of life especially for families What are the arguments for and against families choosing to live and work in the countryside for example as farmers What is your own view about this 78
- Should Government spend money on art when they have so many other important issues? 61
- Many criminals re offend after they have been punished Why do some people continue to commit crime s after they have been punished and what measures can be taken to tackle this problem 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 2, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Lying
...acets will be discussed succinctly. “lying at the top of hierarchy brings more rig...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 18, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...on their shoulders. Meanwhile, those who are opponents of the aforementioned idea co...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, e.g., first, if, moreover, nonetheless, regarding, so, thus, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1974.0 1615.20841683 122% => OK
No of words: 359.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.49860724234 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35284910392 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.27194317705 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 229.0 176.041082164 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.637883008357 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 603.0 506.74238477 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.4986849692 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.894736842 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8947368421 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.73684210526 7.06120827912 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.127495538136 0.244688304435 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0365462951948 0.084324248473 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0390582421274 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0757088041587 0.151304729494 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0397193399185 0.056905535591 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.62 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.59 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 78.4519038076 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.