Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion
It is universally accepted that knowledge increases by sharing. Some people intend to share their understandings and pass on their ideas freely. However, there are a few people who disagree with the same. In my opinion, knowledge of academics should be accessible to all.
The modern world has transformed into a competitive world in all aspects.
Technology has improved in a broad spectrum. Although, in earlier times, technology was underdeveloped and people did not rely on it as much as they do in today's time. For instance, schools have adapted e-learning methods rather than primitive teaching methods.
Presently competition is increasing rapidly, due to which certain information is crucial to share freely. Moreover sharing scientific knowledge have certain repercussions attached to it. For example, a scientific institute cannot by any means give out information about their ongoing research projects and future projects, as it is very crucial and other people may use of for their benefit and produce illegal and unauthorized items. The information provided by scientists may be used by terrorist organisations to create havoc and to threaten the world population.
Furthermore, Businessmen hesitate to share their business tactics for free or endorse their products for free. Similarly, scientists do not prefer sharing their ideas, knowledge about their findings. The joint factor between these two examples is that every individual wants to ace in this competitive world. Privatisation has influenced the world economy and people and demanding money to share any knowledge. As a result, the cost of education has increased tremendously since the last decade.
In my view, every individual should have access to attaining knowledge on the academic front. As far as the scientific and business world is concerned, there should be certain limitations on the knowledge which is to be shared.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-17 | paniz_kiani | 67 | view |
| 2022-12-08 | CheeLee | 78 | view |
| 2022-05-05 | Sarina2021 | 73 | view |
| 2022-01-22 | khanhuyennnnnnnnnnnnn | 84 | view |
| 2021-11-23 | niloya | 67 | view |
- PREVENTION IS BETTER THAN CURE Do you agree or disagree that out of the country s health budget A large proportion should be diverted from treatment to spending on health and education and preventive measures 73
- Without capital punishment the death penalty our lives are less secure and crimes of violence increase Capital punishment is essential to control violence in society To What extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 56
- Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research business and academic world Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely Discuss both these views and give you 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 107, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
...information is crucial to share freely. Moreover sharing scientific knowledge have certa...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, similarly, so, for example, for instance, as a result, in my opinion, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1622.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.49830508475 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02228437035 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586440677966 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 504.9 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.1032236348 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.3684210526 106.682146367 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.5263157895 20.7667163134 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.36842105263 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.224846027354 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.061076531019 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0423430015173 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103008330737 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0500206132913 0.056905535591 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 50.2224549098 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.32 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.36 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 9.78957915832 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.