Some people think that there should be strict laws to control the amount of noise a person makes because of the disturbance it causes to people. Discuss the advantages and disadvantages.
Whether the government should adopt rules to diminish harmful effects of big noises is a debatable question among people. I believe that some benefits and drawbacks of this should be considered before I give my own opinion.
On the one hand, banning an individual making big noises are advantageous for other people at different aspects. It is a fact that noisy sounds which exceeds the recommended level of the Medical Faculty can cause a variety of harmful symptoms for humans, such as headache, fatigue, insomnia, or even deaf. Therefore, if the government poses restrictions on making noise for individuals, the habitats will be quieter, which helps people to sleep well and avoid stresses caused by loud sounds. Good sleeps and calm feelings makes people feel energetic and focused when they are working, which raises their productivity at work. For those reasons, it is necessary for the government to pose some restrictions on making noise.
On the other hand, prohibiting individuals from being noisy has several drawbacks. First, when people cannot make noise, it is so hard for them to hold concerts that often go with big noises. As a result, entertaining and charity activities could be laid off due to the lack of a conveyed tool. Second, with new restrictions on noises, people feel less happy because they are no longer be free to sing or repair their houses. No matter what they do, a fear of breaking rules always goes around them, deterring them from enjoying the life and a sense of freedom.
In conclusion, new strict rules to limit the annoyance of big noises of individuals are essential to protect people’s health and their work productivity. However, these restrictions may also have negative impacts on people’s lives. I strongly believe that we need these rules to make our life quality better.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-12-10 | Hanachan123456789 | 84 | view |
- Some people think that strict punishments for driving offences are the key to reducing traffic accidents Others however believe that other measures would be more effective in improving road safety Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 78
- For school children their teachers have more influence on their intelligence and social development than their parents To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- You have recently started work in a new company Write a letter to a friend In your letter Explain why you changed your jobs Describe your new job Tell him her your other news 73
- In many countries today people in cities either live alone or in small family units rather than in large family groups Is this a positive or negative trend 78
- Some people claim that museums and art galleries are not needed today because everyone can see historical objects or art works by computer Do you agree or disagree 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whether” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
Whether the government should adopt rules to di...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, may, second, so, therefore, well, in conclusion, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1529.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04620462046 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70188004141 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.633663366337 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 461.7 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.308146101 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.933333333 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.6 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.24808370635 0.244688304435 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0784350025051 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0482165687206 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137645459026 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0303673440037 0.056905535591 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.