Do you think honesty is the most important characteristic for a leader
People will vote leaders for many times within their lives time. In common, voting for a leader for a student organization group usually is one person’s first voting time. Therefore, they need to consider which one characteristic of the leader is the most important. While some people believe that becoming to a best leader, the honest is the most crucial and inevitable one. However, personally, I have a different idea that talking ability and thinking ability should be the most important.
First of all, it is talking ability that will make a student group well organized and more harmonious. As I know, only when people have good talking ability will they know how to communicate with their group numbers. Furthermore, a leader with high talking ability will how to coordinate the relationship within the group when their group numbers conflict with each other. For instance, Choi, the leader of our school student union, has high talking ability. Choi usually tries to communicate with anyone in the student union before every activity and talks to every group number what they should prepare before activities. In this case, each activity will be organized pretty well under Choi's organization. Moreover, when some conflicts happened in the group, Choi will try his best to talk with the numbers who participate in these conflicts, attempting to make them reconciliation. From this example, it is not an overstatement that talking ability is one the more important characteristic that lead should have.
Secondly, hardly does a group will exist for a long time if the group’s leader does not have thinking ability. Still use our school student union as an example, before Choi became to the union leader, Tsai was the group leader. Tsai is a person who does not think of any reason when he meets something that needs to be solved. During his control, many group numbers wrote the exiting letter, and many tasks and plans could not be finished before the deadline. However, Tsai never considered why these things would happen so frequently during that time, so not to mention that he would think of some methods to solve these problems. In this case, our student union totally collapsed at the ending of his term. From this example, it is obvious that thinking ability is an inevitable characteristic for a student group leader.
Certainly, honest also is a pretty important characteristic for a group leader. This will strengthen the relationship between numbers and leaders. However, if leaders do not have talking ability and thinking ability, these groups will disappear pretty quickly.
In conclusion, from my perspective, I believe that talking ability and thinking ability should be the most important characteristics for a group leader.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-31 | Fifi13 | 76 | view |
| 2023-09-30 | yaya04 | 76 | view |
| 2023-07-10 | Mahshid_lip | 3 | view |
| 2023-07-07 | Hibahtabbaa | 60 | view |
| 2023-07-05 | Karicaia | 76 | view |
- do you agree or disagree with the statement students should be required to study basic science to graduate 71
- teachers performance should be evaluated by students rather than by other teachers 73
- if you need to discuss upsetting or controversial problems with others you should use e mail and text messages rather than use the telephone or voice messaging 76
- do you think shopping in a small store is better than in a supermarket 76
- do you agree or disagree with the following statement sports should have equal financial support as academic courses and libraries in universities and colleges 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 311, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...le some people believe that becoming to a best leader, the honest is the most cru...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, then, therefore, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 9.8082437276 173% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 43.0788530466 95% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 52.1666666667 84% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2319.0 1977.66487455 117% => OK
No of words: 450.0 407.700716846 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15333333333 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.6057793516 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71015374718 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 212.727598566 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.435555555556 0.524837075471 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 714.6 618.680645161 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.2620809981 48.9658058833 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.625 100.406767564 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.75 20.6045352989 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.20833333333 5.45110844103 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.238728002475 0.236089414692 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0898203823219 0.076458572812 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0910980420437 0.0737576698707 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.202739615582 0.150856017488 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0899829753218 0.0645574589148 139% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 11.7677419355 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 10.9000537634 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.2 8.01818996416 90% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 86.8835125448 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.