Some people think the government should spend money on faster means of public transport. However, others think money should be spent on other priorities (eg cost, environment). Discuss both views and give your own opinion
In today’s world, utilizing public transport is a trend, and developing public transport system may be a must for many countries. Some people argue that the government should only focus on increasing the speed of public transport while others think money should be spent on other categories. From my point of view, I believe that faster means of public transport is necessary but the pivotal role of other priorities (eg cost, environment) is undeniable.
On the one hand, I concur that there are several benefits when operating public transport at high speed. Firstly, it is true that this increase will certainly bring a reduction in traveling time and thus, avoid wasting the time of passengers and improve the capacity of the whole system. Secondly, I believe that this is the most effective way of attracting more and more people in this kind of transport. For example, people tend to choose personal vehicles because of their speed and convenience but now means of public transport will be taken into consideration if the system can fulfill their time-related requirements.
On the other hand, I am more convinced that other priorities such as effectiveness, environmental protection,… are also needed to be noticed. Firstly, it is obvious that people are encouraged to use public transport mainly due to environmental problems. Reducing the number of cars, motorbikes in cities is now the most widely used method among many Western countries. Therefore, it will be meaningless if those public systems harm the environment. Secondly, to become an effective system, its cost may be relatively low so that it can be an option for people from different classes. Taking Vietnam as a prime example, even though the public transport system here is not popularly developed, its cost is certainly affordable especially for students who study in big cities such as Hanoi like me.
In conclusion, although utilizing faster means of transport can bring positive effects, I truly believe that other priorities such as cost, environment,… are also needed to be invested by authorities for long term benefits.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-06-07 | longdotrungga | 78 | view |
| 2022-06-07 | longdotrungga | 78 | view |
| 2021-08-18 | lennie.butera | 84 | view |
| 2021-01-15 | Huy Do | 73 | view |
| 2020-11-16 | lhm.ils | 73 | view |
- The availability of entertainment such as video games on handheld devices is harmful to individuals and to the society they live in To what extent do you agree and disagree 56
- Some universities now offer their courses on the Internet so that people can study online Is this a positive or negative development 56
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology Has this been a positive or negative development 84
- The availability of entertainment such as video game on handheld devices are harmful to individual an to the society that they live in To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- The quality of life in large cities is decreasing What could be the reasons behind this What measures can be taken to resolve this problem 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 109, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , …
... effectiveness, environmental protection,… are also needed to be noticed. Firstly,...
^^
Line 4, column 163, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , …
...her priorities such as cost, environment,… are also needed to be invested by autho...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, in conclusion, kind of, such as, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1783.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 339.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25958702065 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29091512845 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98973918405 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554572271386 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 556.2 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.8439471037 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.357142857 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2142857143 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.2142857143 7.06120827912 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.319377142251 0.244688304435 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109986834685 0.084324248473 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.120397974502 0.0667982634062 180% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.210229774445 0.151304729494 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.156856524549 0.056905535591 276% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.