All types of container in Vietnam should be banned To what extents do you agree or disagree

Essay topics:

All types of container in Vietnam should be banned. To what extents do you agree or disagree?

Container is the main mean of transport which is used to deliver goods in almost every corner in Vietnam. However, there is an arousing voice that a ban should be enforced to all kinds of container. I am not in favor of this statement. My opinion and reasons for it will be discussed in greater detail in the following.
Containers come up against a lot of criticism because of its disadvantage. They endanger well-beings and lives of passengers. Containers are too huge in size when compared to traffic conditions in such a developing country like Vietnam. They not only put pressure on streets but also invade the area of transportation of other people. The former may make streets become weaker, which puts passengers in jeopardy and demand regular renovations. Traffic infrastructure in Vietnam is only at a decent level, with many rough narrow roads which may contain pot holes. The latter deteriorates the experience of Vietnamese passengers in conditions. These factors raise the dispute among many people that they demand all kinds of container to be banned.
I am not an advocate of this opinion. As a matter of fact, containers an crucial part in the industry, which contributes to Vietnam’s finance and many aspects of life. Vietnam is a developing country, so its budgets are limited. Containers cost much less than ships or airplanes. In industrial parks, the distances between factories is not so long so people prefer using containers. Containers also takes fewer procedures than other delivering means of transport. As a result, containers cannot be replaced by any other means of transport at the moment.
To conclude, despite the drawbacks that containers bring about, I assume that containers should not be banned in order to accelerate the industry and finance of Vietnam.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-12-24 Trần Ánh Vy 73 view
2024-12-17 Kha Linh 61 view
2024-12-17 Kha Linh 61 view
2024-12-14 Sang Sang Sang 73 view
2024-12-13 Sang Sang Sang 78 view

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, may, so, still, therefore, for example, for instance, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1345.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 273.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92673992674 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85878134666 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.589743589744 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 432.0 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.3271029251 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.1176470588 106.682146367 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0588235294 20.7667163134 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.94117647059 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185325384457 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0649810133096 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.070505840401 0.0667982634062 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12841728122 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0745415687236 0.056905535591 131% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 13.0946893788 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.