The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
You should write at least 150 words.
The given line graph illustrates the number of goods delivered by four distinct means of transportation in the UK from 1974 to 2002.
Overall, all four modes of transport experienced an upward trend. While goods transported by road and water were on the top of the graph, that of pipeline, on the other hand, ranked the lowest.
Looking at the graph, it is immediately obvious that road and water transportation were the most popular of the four. Starting off with approximately 70 million tones in 1974, road delivery then peaked in 2002 with nearly 100 million tones of goods delivered. A similar trend was seen with water transportation which went from about 38 million tones in 1974 to over 70 million tones at the end of the graph.
Goods transported by rail and pipeline were not as popular as the other two. The quantities of good delivered by rail increased marginally over the period to slightly over 40 million tones in 2002. With the lowest number of goods delivered by pipeline, this kind of transportation still increased progressively from almost nothing to over 20 million tones at the end of the graph.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2024-03-03 | Sang Sang Sang | 73 | view |
2024-03-03 | Sang Sang Sang | 73 | view |
2023-07-18 | cookie12 | 78 | view |
2023-06-10 | taocute.s1 | 74 | view |
2023-06-09 | Roy An | 11 | view |
- The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant You should write at l 73
- In a number of countries some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport Discuss both view 78
- The line graph shows the oil production and consumption in China between 1982 and 2006 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 239, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ed in 2002 with nearly 100 million tones of goods delivered. A similar trend was ...
^^
Line 4, column 229, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...in 2002. With the lowest number of goods delivered by pipeline, this kind of tran...
^^
Line 4, column 311, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sportation still increased progressively from almost nothing to over 20 million t...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
look, still, then, while, kind of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 934.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 192.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86458333333 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78878893967 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.515625 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 271.8 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.9476721506 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.777777778 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3333333333 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.77777777778 5.23603664747 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.236296178045 0.215688989381 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122382375338 0.103423049105 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0496976071256 0.0843802449381 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174409689367 0.15604864568 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0396235132943 0.0819641961636 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.31 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.